Literature DB >> 25113449

Stomatal and mesophyll conductances to CO₂ in different plant groups: underrated factors for predicting leaf photosynthesis responses to climate change?

Jaume Flexas1, Marc Carriquí2, Rafael E Coopman3, Jorge Gago4, Jeroni Galmés2, Sebastià Martorell2, Fermín Morales5, Antonio Diaz-Espejo6.   

Abstract

The climate change conditions predicted for the end of the current century are expected to have an impact on the performance of plants under natural conditions. The variables which are foreseen to have a larger effect are increased CO2 concentration and temperature. Although it is generally considered CO2 assimilation rate could be increased by the increasing levels of CO2, it has been reported in previous studies that acclimation to high CO2 results in reductions of physiological parameters involved in photosynthesis, like the maximum carboxylation rate (Vc,max), stomatal conductance (gs) and mesophyll conductance to CO2 (gm). On the one hand, most of the previous modeling efforts have neglected the potential role played by the acclimation of gm to high CO2 and temperature. On the other hand, the effect of climate change on plant clades other than angiosperms, like ferns, has received little attention, and there are no studies evaluating the potential impact of increasing CO2 and temperature on these species. In this study we predicted responses of several representative species among angiosperms, gymnosperms and ferns to increasing CO2 and temperature. Our results show that species with lower photosynthetic capacity - such as some ferns and gymnosperms - would be proportionally more favored under these foreseen environmental conditions. The main reason for this difference is the lower diffusion limitation imposed by gs and gm in plants having high capacity for photosynthesis among the angiosperms, which reduces the positive effect of increasing CO2. However, this apparent advantage of low-diffusion species would be canceled if the two conductances - gs and gm - acclimate and are down regulated to high CO2, which is basically unknown, especially for gymnosperms and ferns. Hence, for a better understanding of different plant responses to future climate, studies are urged in which the actual photosynthetic response/acclimation to increased CO2 and temperature of ferns, gymnosperms and other under-evaluated plant groups is assessed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiosperms; Climatic change; Diffusive limitations; Ferns; Mesophyll conductance; Photosynthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25113449     DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Sci        ISSN: 0168-9452            Impact factor:   4.729


  18 in total

1.  Two tropical conifers show strong growth and water-use efficiency responses to altered CO2 concentration.

Authors:  James W Dalling; Lucas A Cernusak; Klaus Winter; Jorge Aranda; Milton Garcia; Aurelio Virgo; Alexander W Cheesman; Andres Baresch; Carlos Jaramillo; Benjamin L Turner
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  A Novel Hypothesis for the Role of Photosynthetic Physiology in Shaping Macroevolutionary Patterns.

Authors:  Charilaos Yiotis; Jennifer C McElwain
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Anatomical and diffusional determinants inside leaves explain the difference in photosynthetic capacity between Cypripedium and Paphiopedilum, Orchidaceae.

Authors:  Zhong-Hui Yang; Wei Huang; Qiu-Yun Yang; Wei Chang; Shi-Bao Zhang
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Influence of light and nitrogen on the photosynthetic efficiency in the C4 plant Miscanthus × giganteus.

Authors:  Jian-Ying Ma; Wei Sun; Nuria K Koteyeva; Elena Voznesenskaya; Samantha S Stutz; Anthony Gandin; Andreia M Smith-Moritz; Joshua L Heazlewood; Asaph B Cousins
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Different leaf cost-benefit strategies of ferns distributed in contrasting light habitats of sub-tropical forests.

Authors:  Shi-Dan Zhu; Rong-Hua Li; Juan Song; Peng-Cheng He; Hui Liu; Frank Berninger; Qing Ye
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 6.  Is Tempranillo Blanco Grapevine Different from Tempranillo Tinto Only in the Color of the Grapes? An Updated Review.

Authors:  Tefide Kizildeniz; Inmaculada Pascual; Ghislaine Hilbert; Juan José Irigoyen; Fermín Morales
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 7.  Relationships of Leaf Net Photosynthesis, Stomatal Conductance, and Mesophyll Conductance to Primary Metabolism: A Multispecies Meta-Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Jorge Gago; Danilo de Menezes Daloso; Carlos María Figueroa; Jaume Flexas; Alisdair Robert Fernie; Zoran Nikoloski
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Photosynthetic Response of an Alpine Plant, Rhododendron delavayi Franch, to Water Stress and Recovery: The Role of Mesophyll Conductance.

Authors:  Yanfei Cai; Jihua Wang; Shifeng Li; Lu Zhang; Lvchun Peng; Weijia Xie; Feihu Liu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Responses of photosynthetic parameters to drought in subtropical forest ecosystem of China.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Shaoqiang Wang; Yonggang Chi; Qingkang Li; Kun Huang; Quanzhou Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sustained enhancement of photosynthesis in coffee trees grown under free-air CO2 enrichment conditions: disentangling the contributions of stomatal, mesophyll, and biochemical limitations.

Authors:  Fábio M DaMatta; Alice G Godoy; Paulo E Menezes-Silva; Samuel C V Martins; Lílian M V P Sanglard; Leandro E Morais; André Torre-Neto; Raquel Ghini
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.