Literature DB >> 25113425

Which nostril should be used for nasotracheal intubation: the right or left? A randomized clinical trial.

Aiji Boku1, Hiroshi Hanamoto2, Yohsuke Hirose3, Chiho Kudo2, Yoshinari Morimoto2, Mistutaka Sugimura2, Hitoshi Niwa2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine which nostril is more suitable for nasotracheal intubation in patients with normal patency of both nostrils.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Operating room of a university medical center. PATIENTS: 191 ASA physical status 1 and 2 patients scheduled for elective oral surgery requiring general anesthesia with nasotracheal intubation.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to two groups to undergo nasotracheal intubation through the right nostril (Group R; n = 96) or the left nostril (n = 95). Standard traditional nasotracheal intubation was performed using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Tube rotation was attempted for alignment toward the glottis, and Magill forceps were then used to assist intubation, as necessary. MEASUREMENTS: Epistaxis was inspected in the pharynx after the tube tip was passed through the nasal cavity and 15 minutes after nasotracheal intubation was completed. Intubation time was the interval between when the anesthesiologist opened the patient's mouth with the cross finger maneuver and when the tube was connected to the anesthetic circuit after nasotracheal completion. MAIN
RESULTS: The frequency of epistaxis was significantly lower in Group R than Group L (P = 0.0006). Although there was no significant difference in nasal passage time between two groups, the intubation time in Group R (24.5 ± 9.4 sec) was shorter than in Group L (30.5 ± 15.6 sec; P = 0.0015).
CONCLUSION: Nasal intubation via the right nostril is more safely performed than with the left nostril. Because of less epistaxis and faster intubation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epistaxis; Intubation time; Nasal cavity; Nasal passage time; Nasotracheal intubation; Nasotracheal tube rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25113425     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  7 in total

1.  Possible association between successful intubation via the right nostril and anatomical variations of the nasopharynx during nasotracheal intubation: a multiplanar imaging study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Takasugi; Koichi Futagawa; Tatsuo Konishi; Daisuke Morimoto; Takahiko Okuda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Validation of Simple Methods to Select a Suitable Nostril for Nasotracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Cattleya Thongrong; Pattramon Thaisiam; Pornthep Kasemsiri
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-01

3.  Which nostril should be used for nasotracheal intubation with Airtraq NT®: the right or left? A randomized clinical trial

Authors:  Zehra İpek Arslan; Neşe Türkyılmaz
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 0.973

4.  Comparison of disinfection effect between benzalkonium chloride and povidone iodine in nasotracheal intubation: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Aiji Sato-Boku; Keiji Nagano; Yoshiaki Hasegawa; Yuji Kamimura; Yoshiki Sento; MinHye So; Eisuke Kako; Masahiro Okuda; Naoko Tachi; Hidekazu Ito; Yushi Adachi; Kazuya Sobue
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  A comparison between the Disposcope endoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Junma Yu; Rui Hu; Lining Wu; Peng Sun; Zhi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Comparison of hemostatic effect and safety between epinephrine and tramazoline during nasotracheal intubation: a double-blind randomized trial.

Authors:  Aiji Sato-Boku; Yoshiki Sento; Yuji Kamimura; Eisuke Kako; Masahiro Okuda; Naoko Tachi; Yoko Okumura; Mayumi Hashimoto; Hiroshi Hoshijima; Fumihito Suzuki; Kazuya Sobue
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  The usefulness of the McGrath MAC laryngoscope in comparison with Airwayscope and Macintosh laryngoscope during routine nasotracheal intubation: a randomaized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aiji Sato Boku; Kazuya Sobue; Eisuke Kako; Naoko Tachi; Yoko Okumura; Mayuko Kanazawa; Mayumi Hashimoto; Jun Harada
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.217

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.