Felipe De Los Rios1, Dawn O Kleindorfer2, Amy Guzik3, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez4, Navdeep Sangha5, Gyanendra Kumar6, James C Grotta5, Jin-Moo Lee6, Brett C Meyer3, Lee H Schwamm7, Pooja Khatri2. 1. Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Neurology, Sanna Healthcare Network, Lima, Peru. Electronic address: delosrfe@ucmail.uc.edu. 2. Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. 3. Department of Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. 4. Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York. 5. Department of Neurology, University of Texas, Houston, Texas. 6. Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. 7. Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachussets.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The indications and contraindications for intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) use in ischemic stroke can be confusing to the practicing neurologist. Here we seek to describe practice patterns regarding decision-making among US stroke clinicians. METHODS: Stroke clinicians (attending and fellow) from the 8 National Institutes of Health SPOTRIAS (Specialized Programs of Translational Research in Acute Stroke) centers were asked to complete a survey ahead of the 2012 SPOTRIAS Investigators' meeting. RESULTS: A total of 51 surveys were collected (71% response rate). Most of the responders were attending physicians (68%). Only 18% of clinicians reported strictly adhering to current American Heart Association guidelines for treatment within 3 hours from symptom onset; this increased to 51% for the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III criteria in the 3 to 4.5 hours time frame. All clinicians treat eligible patients in the 3 to 4.5 hours time frame. The great majority will recommend rtPA in the following scenarios: (1) elderly individuals irrespective of age (97%); (2) severe stroke irrespective of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (95%); or (3) suspected stroke with seizures at symptom onset (91%). None recommended rtPA in the setting of an international normalized ratio >1.7. Most clinicians defined mild strokes as an exclusion based on the perceived disability of the deficit (80%) rather than on a specific NIHSS threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Most surveyed stroke clinicians seem to find that the current IV rtPA eligibility criteria for the 3-hour time frame too restrictive. All would recommend rtPA to eligible patients in the 3 to 4.5 hours time frame despite the absence of an U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication.
BACKGROUND: The indications and contraindications for intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) use in ischemic stroke can be confusing to the practicing neurologist. Here we seek to describe practice patterns regarding decision-making among US stroke clinicians. METHODS:Stroke clinicians (attending and fellow) from the 8 National Institutes of Health SPOTRIAS (Specialized Programs of Translational Research in Acute Stroke) centers were asked to complete a survey ahead of the 2012 SPOTRIAS Investigators' meeting. RESULTS: A total of 51 surveys were collected (71% response rate). Most of the responders were attending physicians (68%). Only 18% of clinicians reported strictly adhering to current American Heart Association guidelines for treatment within 3 hours from symptom onset; this increased to 51% for the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III criteria in the 3 to 4.5 hours time frame. All clinicians treat eligible patients in the 3 to 4.5 hours time frame. The great majority will recommend rtPA in the following scenarios: (1) elderly individuals irrespective of age (97%); (2) severe stroke irrespective of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (95%); or (3) suspected stroke with seizures at symptom onset (91%). None recommended rtPA in the setting of an international normalized ratio >1.7. Most clinicians defined mild strokes as an exclusion based on the perceived disability of the deficit (80%) rather than on a specific NIHSS threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Most surveyed stroke clinicians seem to find that the current IV rtPA eligibility criteria for the 3-hour time frame too restrictive. All would recommend rtPA to eligible patients in the 3 to 4.5 hours time frame despite the absence of an U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication.
Authors: I L Katzan; A J Furlan; L E Lloyd; J I Frank; D L Harper; J A Hinchey; J P Hammel; A Qu; C A Sila Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ying Xian; Li Liang; Eric E Smith; Lee H Schwamm; Mathew J Reeves; DaiWai M Olson; Adrian F Hernandez; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric D Peterson Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Edward C Jauch; Jeffrey L Saver; Harold P Adams; Askiel Bruno; J J Buddy Connors; Bart M Demaerschalk; Pooja Khatri; Paul W McMullan; Adnan I Qureshi; Kenneth Rosenfield; Phillip A Scott; Debbie R Summers; David Z Wang; Max Wintermark; Howard Yonas Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Chelsea S Kidwell; Reza Jahan; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jeffry R Alger; Val Nenov; Zahra Ajani; Lei Feng; Brett C Meyer; Scott Olson; Lee H Schwamm; Albert J Yoo; Randolph S Marshall; Philip M Meyers; Dileep R Yavagal; Max Wintermark; Judy Guzy; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marta Guillan; Araceli Alonso-Canovas; Jaime Gonzalez-Valcarcel; Nuria Garcia Barragan; Juan Garcia Caldentey; Ignacio Hernandez-Medrano; Alicia Defelipe-Mimbrera; Victor Sanchez-Gonzalez; Elena Terecoasa; Maria Alonso de Leciñana; Jaime Masjuan Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Joanna M Wardlaw; Veronica Murray; Eivind Berge; Gregory del Zoppo; Peter Sandercock; Richard L Lindley; Geoff Cohen Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Louise E Craig; Sandy Middleton; Helen Hamilton; Fern Cudlip; Victoria Swatzell; Andrei V Alexandrov; Elizabeth Lightbody; Dame Caroline Watkins; Sheeba Philip; Dominique A Cadilhac; Elizabeth McInnes; Simeon Dale; Anne W Alexandrov Journal: Interv Neurol Date: 2018-09-25
Authors: Mohammed H Alanazy; Rima B Barakeh; Alanood Asiri; Maha F Edrees; Ahmad R Abuzinadah; Bandar N Aljafen; Taim Muayqil Journal: Neurol Res Int Date: 2018-02-13
Authors: Ava L Liberman; Daniel Pinto; Sara K Rostanski; Daniel L Labovitz; Andrew M Naidech; Shyam Prabhakaran Journal: Neurohospitalist Date: 2018-09-13
Authors: Jan F Scheitz; Henrik Gensicke; Sanne M Zinkstok; Sami Curtze; Marcel Arnold; Christian Hametner; Alessandro Pezzini; Guillaume Turc; Andrea Zini; Visnja Padjen; Susanne Wegener; Annika Nordanstig; Lars Kellert; Georg Kägi; Yannick Bejot; Patrik Michel; Didier Leys; Christian H Nolte; Paul J Nederkoorn; Stefan T Engelter Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 2.692