Literature DB >> 25113079

Investigating the utility of previously developed prediction scores in acute ischemic stroke patients in the stroke belt.

Amelia K Boehme1, Pawan V Rawal2, Michael J Lyerly3, Karen C Albright4, Reza Bavarsad Shahripour2, Paola Palazzo2, Niren Kapoor2, Mohammad Alvi2, J Thomas Houston2, Mark R Harrigan5, Luis Cava6, April Sisson2, Anne W Alexandrov7, Andrei V Alexandrov2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the utility of previously developed scoring systems, we compared SEDAN, named after the components of the score (baseline blood Sugar, Early infarct signs and (hyper) Dense cerebral artery sign on admission computed tomography scan, Age, and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission), Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (THRIVE), Houston Intra-arterial Therapy (HIAT), and HIAT-2 scoring systems among patients receiving systemic (intravenous [IV] tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]) and endovascular (intra-arterial [IA]) treatments.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all IV tPA and IA patients presenting to our center from 2008-2011. The scores were assessed in patients who were treated with IV tPA only, IA only, and a combination of IV tPA and IA (IV-IA). We tested the ability of THRIVE to predict discharge modified Rankin scale (mRS) 3-6, HIAT and HIAT-2 discharge mRS 4-6, and SEDAN symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH).
RESULTS: Of the 366 patients who were included in this study, 243 had IV tPA only, 89 had IA only, and 34 had IV-IA. THRIVE was predictive of mRS 3-6 in the IV-IA (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-2.91) and the IV group (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.43-2.04), but not in the IA group. HIAT was predictive of mRS 4-6 in the IA (OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 1.65-7.25), IV (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 2.26-5.33), and IV-IA group (OR, 6.48; 95% CI, 1.41-29.71). HIAT-2 was predictive of mRS 4-6 in the IA (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.03-1.87) and IV group (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.18-1.57), but not in the IV-IA group. SEDAN was not predictive of sICH in the IA or the IV-IA group, but was predictive in the IV group (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.01-2.36).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that although highly predictive of outcome in the original study design treatment groups, prediction scores may not generalize to all patient samples, highlighting the importance of validating prediction scores in diverse samples.
Copyright © 2014 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; epidemiology; outcome; stroke recovery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25113079      PMCID: PMC4780244          DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1052-3057            Impact factor:   2.136


  22 in total

Review 1.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how?

Authors:  R Bender; S Lange
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Metro Stroke Task Force: first-year experience.

Authors:  G Hademenos
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Thrombolytic agents in the treatment of stroke.

Authors:  M S Pessin; G J Del Zoppo; C J Estol
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.592

4.  Survey of emergency physicians about recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Devin L Brown; William G Barsan; Lynda D Lisabeth; Michael E Gallery; Lewis B Morgenstern
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 5.  Reasons why few patients with acute stroke receive tissue plasminogen activator.

Authors:  Kara Z Bambauer; S Claiborne Johnston; Derek E Bambauer; Justin A Zivin
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2006-05

6.  Intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy for ischemic stroke: Houston experience 1996 to 2000.

Authors:  J C Grotta; W S Burgin; A El-Mitwalli; M Long; M Campbell; L B Morgenstern; M Malkoff; A V Alexandrov
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2001-12

7.  Acute stroke care in the US: results from 4 pilot prototypes of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry.

Authors:  Mathew J Reeves; Shalini Arora; Joseph P Broderick; Michael Frankel; John P Heinrich; Susan Hickenbottom; Herbert Karp; Kenneth A LaBresh; Ann Malarcher; G Mensah; Charles J Moomaw; Lee Schwamm; Paul Weiss
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Werner Hacke; Markku Kaste; Erich Bluhmki; Miroslav Brozman; Antoni Dávalos; Donata Guidetti; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Zakaria Medeghri; Thomas Machnig; Dietmar Schneider; Rüdiger von Kummer; Nils Wahlgren; Danilo Toni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Identifying patients at high risk for poor outcome after intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Hen Hallevi; Andrew D Barreto; David S Liebeskind; Miriam M Morales; Sheryl B Martin-Schild; Anitha T Abraham; Jignesh Gadia; Jeffrey L Saver; James C Grotta; Sean I Savitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcome Prediction Models for Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke: Systematic Review and External Validation.

Authors:  Femke Kremers; Esmee Venema; Martijne Duvekot; Lonneke Yo; Reinoud Bokkers; Geert Lycklama À Nijeholt; Adriaan van Es; Aad van der Lugt; Charles Majoie; James Burke; Bob Roozenbeek; Hester Lingsma; Diederik Dippel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 7.914

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.