Literature DB >> 25112961

Next-generation endomyocardial biopsy: the potential of confocal and super-resolution microscopy.

David J Crossman1, Peter N Ruygrok, Yu Feng Hou, Christian Soeller.   

Abstract

Confocal laser scanning microscopy and super-resolution microscopy provide high-contrast and high-resolution fluorescent imaging, which has great potential to increase the diagnostic yield of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). EMB is currently the gold standard for identification of cardiac allograft rejection, myocarditis, and infiltrative and storage diseases. However, standard analysis is dominated by low-contrast bright-field light and electron microscopy (EM); this lack of contrast makes quantification of pathological features difficult. For example, assessment of cardiac allograft rejection relies on subjective grading of H&E histology, which may lead to diagnostic variability between pathologists. This issue could be solved by utilising the high contrast provided by fluorescence methods such as confocal to quantitatively assess the degree of lymphocytic infiltrate. For infiltrative diseases such as amyloidosis, the nanometre resolution provided by EM can be diagnostic in identifying disease-causing fibrils. The recent advent of super-resolution imaging, particularly direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM), provides high-contrast imaging at resolution approaching that of EM. Moreover, dSTORM utilises conventional fluorescence dyes allowing for the same structures to be routinely imaged at the cellular scale and then at the nanoscale. The key benefit of these technologies is that the high contrast facilitates quantitative digital analysis and thereby provides a means to robustly assess critical pathological features. Ultimately, this technology has the ability to provide greater accuracy and precision to EMB assessment, which could result in better outcomes for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25112961     DOI: 10.1007/s10741-014-9455-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Fail Rev        ISSN: 1382-4147            Impact factor:   4.214


  63 in total

1.  Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.

Authors:  Susan Stewart; Gayle L Winters; Michael C Fishbein; Henry D Tazelaar; Jon Kobashigawa; Jacki Abrams; Claus B Andersen; Annalisa Angelini; Gerald J Berry; Margaret M Burke; Anthony J Demetris; Elizabeth Hammond; Silviu Itescu; Charles C Marboe; Bruce McManus; Elaine F Reed; Nancy L Reinsmoen; E Rene Rodriguez; Alan G Rose; Marlene Rose; Nicole Suciu-Focia; Adriana Zeevi; Margaret E Billingham
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Leslie T Cooper; Kenneth L Baughman; Arthur M Feldman; Andrea Frustaci; Mariell Jessup; Uwe Kuhl; Glenn N Levine; Jagat Narula; Randall C Starling; Jeffrey Towbin; Renu Virmani
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Safety of endomyocardial biopsy in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a study analyzing 161 diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  Matthias Paul; Jörg Stypmann; Joachim Gerss; Sophia Wirdeier; Sven Zumhagen; Günter Breithardt; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Thomas Wichter
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Idiopathic giant-cell myocarditis--natural history and treatment. Multicenter Giant Cell Myocarditis Study Group Investigators.

Authors:  L T Cooper; G J Berry; R Shabetai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Current status of endomyocardial biopsy.

Authors:  Aaron M From; Joseph J Maleszewski; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Fluorescent in situ hybridization employing the conventional NBT/BCIP chromogenic stain.

Authors:  Le A Trinh; Marshall D McCutchen; Marianne Bonner-Fraser; Scott E Fraser; Lloyd A Bumm; David W McCauley
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 7.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization in diagnostic cytology.

Authors:  Kevin C Halling; Benjamin R Kipp
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Quantitative Immunohistochemistry of Desmosomal Proteins (Plakoglobin, Desmoplakin and Plakophilin), Connexin-43, and N-cadherin in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: An Autopsy Study.

Authors:  Fabio Tavora; Mingchang Zhang; Nathaniel Cresswell; Ling Li; David Fowler; Marcello Franco; Allen Burke
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2013-03-29

Review 9.  Advanced methods in fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  Luke Fritzky; David Lagunoff
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol (Amst)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.916

10.  Video-rate nanoscopy using sCMOS camera-specific single-molecule localization algorithms.

Authors:  Fang Huang; Tobias M P Hartwich; Felix E Rivera-Molina; Yu Lin; Whitney C Duim; Jane J Long; Pradeep D Uchil; Jordan R Myers; Michelle A Baird; Walther Mothes; Michael W Davidson; Derek Toomre; Joerg Bewersdorf
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Histopathology in HCM.

Authors:  Beatriz San Millán Tejado; Cristina Jou
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2018-08-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.