Literature DB >> 25112841

Potential effects of large linear pipeline construction on soil and vegetation in ecologically fragile regions.

Jun Xiao1, Ya-Feng Wang, Peng Shi, Lei Yang, Li-Ding Chen.   

Abstract

Long-distance pipeline construction results in marked human disturbance of the regional ecosystem and brings into question the safety of pipeline construction with respect to the environment. Thus, the direct environmental impact and proper handling of such large projects have received much attention. The potential environmental effects, however, have not been fully addressed, particularly for large linear pipeline projects, and the threshold of such effects is unclear. In this study, two typical eco-fragile areas in western China, where large linear construction projects have been conducted, were chosen as the case study areas. Soil quality indices (SQI) and vegetation indices (VI), representing the most important potential effects, were used to analyze the scope of the effect of large pipeline construction on the surrounding environment. These two indices in different buffer zones along the pipeline were compared against the background values. The analysis resulted in three main findings. First, pipeline construction continues to influence the nearby eco-environment even after a 4-year recovery period. During this period, the effect on vegetation due to pipeline construction reaches 300 m beyond the working area, and is much larger in distance than the effect on soil, which is mainly confined to within 30 m either side of the pipeline, indicating that vegetation is more sensitive than soil to this type of human disturbance. However, the effect may not reach beyond 500 m from the pipeline. Second, the scope of the effect in terms of distance on vegetation may also be determined by the frequency of disturbance and the intensity of the pipeline construction. The greater the number of pipelines in an area, the higher the construction intensity and the more frequent the disturbance. Frequent disturbance may expand the effect on vegetation on both sides of the pipeline, but not on soil quality. Third, the construction may eliminate the stable, resident plant community. During the recovery period, the plant community in the work area of the pipeline is replaced by some species that are rare or uncommon in the resident plant community because of human disturbance, thereby increasing the plant diversity in the work area. In terms of plant succession, the duration of the recovery period has a direct effect on the composition and structure of the plant community. The findings provide a theoretical basis and scientific foundation for improving the environmental impact assessment (EIA) of oil and gas pipeline construction as it pertains to the desert steppe ecosystem, and provide a reference point for recovery and management of the eco-environment during the pipeline construction period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25112841     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-014-3986-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  9 in total

1.  Effects of pipeline construction on wetland ecosystems: Russia-China Oil Pipeline Project (Mohe-Daqing Section).

Authors:  Xiaofei Yu; Guoping Wang; Yuanchun Zou; Qiang Wang; Hongmei Zhao; Xianguo Lu
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Chance and challenge for China on ecosystem management: lessons from the west-to-east pipeline project construction.

Authors:  Liding Chen; Qichen Gao
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment.

Authors:  Zhi-hong Zou; Yi Yun; Jing-nan Sun
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.565

4.  Review of the effects of in-stream pipeline crossing construction on aquatic ecosystems and examination of Canadian methodologies for impact assessment.

Authors:  Lucie M Lévesque; Monique G Dubé
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Environmental analysis in the selection of alternative corridors in a long-distance linear project: a methodological proposal.

Authors:  Alejandro J Rescia; Elizabeth N Astrada; Julieta Bono; Carlos A Blasco; Paula Meli; Jorge M Adámoli
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation.

Authors:  Richard Margoluis; Caroline Stem; Nick Salafsky; Marcia Brown
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2008-10-17

7.  A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: unified classifications of threats and actions.

Authors:  Nick Salafsky; Daniel Salzer; Alison J Stattersfield; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Rachel Neugarten; Stuart H M Butchart; Ben Collen; Neil Cox; Lawrence L Master; Sheila O'Connor; David Wilkie
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  The effects of pipeline construction disturbance on soil properties and restoration cycle.

Authors:  Peng Shi; Jun Xiao; Ya-Feng Wang; Li-Ding Chen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Assessing the soil quality of alpine grasslands in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau using a modified soil quality index.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Li; Shikui Dong; Lu Wen; Xuexia Wang; Yu Wu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.513

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A framework for quantifying the extent of impact to plants from linear construction.

Authors:  Jun Xiao; Peng Shi; Ya-Feng Wang; Yang Yu; Lei Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.