Literature DB >> 25112807

Comparison of virtual bronchoscopy to fiber-optic bronchoscopy for assessment of inhalation injury severity.

Herbert P Kwon1, Thomas B Zanders1, Dara D Regn1, Samuel E Burkett1, John A Ward2, Ruth Nguyen1, Corina Necsoiu1, Bryan S Jordan3, Gerald E York4, Santiago Jimenez4, Kevin K Chung3, Leopoldo C Cancio3, Michael J Morris1, Andriy I Batchinsky5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Compare virtual bronchoscopy (VB) to fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) for scoring smoke inhalation injury (SII).
METHODS: Swine underwent computerized tomography (CT) with VB and FOB before (0) and 24 and 48 h after SII. VB and FOB images were scored by 5 providers off line.
RESULTS: FOB and VB scores increased over time (p<0.001) with FOB scoring higher than VB at 0 (0.30±0.79 vs. 0.03±0.17), 24 h (4.21±1.68 vs. 2.47±1.50), and 48h (4.55±1.83 vs. 1.94±1.29). FOB and VB showed association with PaO2-to-FiO2 ratios (PFR) with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC): for PFR≤300, VB 0.830, FOB 0.863; for PFR≤200, VB 0.794, FOB 0.825; for PFR≤100, VB 0.747, FOB 0.777 (all p<0.001). FOB showed 80.3% specificity, 77% sensitivity, 88.8% negative-predictive value (NPV), and 62.3% positive-predictive value (PPV) for PFR≤300 and VB showed 67.2% specificity, 85.5% sensitivity, 91.3% NPV, and 53.4% PPV.
CONCLUSIONS: VB provided similar injury severity scores to FOB, correlated with PFR, and reliably detected airway narrowing. VB performed during admission CT may be a useful screening tool specifically to demonstrate airway narrowing induced by SII.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography scan; Fiber-optic bronchoscopy; Inhalation injury; Swine; Virtual bronchoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25112807     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  6 in total

Review 1.  Inhalation Injury in the Burned Patient.

Authors:  Guillermo Foncerrada; Derek M Culnan; Karel D Capek; Sagrario González-Trejo; Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Lee C Woodson; David N Herndon; Celeste C Finnerty; Jong O Lee
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 2.  Pathophysiology, research challenges, and clinical management of smoke inhalation injury.

Authors:  Perenlei Enkhbaatar; Basil A Pruitt; Oscar Suman; Ronald Mlcak; Steven E Wolf; Hiroyuki Sakurai; David N Herndon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Circulating cell-free DNA as a potential marker in smoke inhalation injury.

Authors:  Yehiel Hayun; Yaron Shoham; Yuval Krieger; Eldad Silberstein; Amos Douvdevani; Dean Ad-El
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 4.  Diagnosis and management of inhalation injury: an updated review.

Authors:  Patrick F Walker; Michelle F Buehner; Leslie A Wood; Nathan L Boyer; Ian R Driscoll; Jonathan B Lundy; Leopoldo C Cancio; Kevin K Chung
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography for Assessing Inhalation Airway Injury: A Technical Review.

Authors:  Yusi Miao; Matthew Brenner; Zhongping Chen
Journal:  Otolaryngol (Sunnyvale)       Date:  2019-04-04

Review 6.  Non-traumatic Pulmonary Emergencies in the Deployed Setting.

Authors:  Nikhil A Huprikar; Steven D Deas; Andrew J Skabelund
Journal:  Curr Pulmonol Rep       Date:  2017-05-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.