Literature DB >> 25112539

Metal artefact reduction algorithms prevent false positive results when assessing patients for cardiac implantable electronic device infection.

Fozia Z Ahmed1, Jacqueline James, Deborah Tout, Parthiban Arumugam, Mamas Mamas, Amir M Zaidi.   

Abstract

Software-based metal artefact reduction (MAR) techniques are available to reduce artefacts from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) in the CT data. The impact of disabling MAR techniques on quantification of 18F-FDG uptake around the CIED has not been examined. We consider the importance of enabling MAR in patients with suspected CIED infection to prevent inaccuracies in quantification of tissue tracer uptake on the attenuation-corrected PET images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25112539     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-014-9955-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  2 in total

1.  Is metal artefact reduction mandatory in cardiac PET/CT imaging in the presence of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads?

Authors:  Pardis Ghafarian; S M R Aghamiri; Mohammad R Ay; Arman Rahmim; Thomas H Schindler; Osman Ratib; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Usefulness of fluorine-18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography for identification of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections.

Authors:  Jean-François Sarrazin; François Philippon; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Franck Molin; Jean Champagne; Isabelle Nault; Louis Blier; Maxime Nadeau; Lyne Charbonneau; Mikaël Trottier; Gilles O'Hara
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 24.094

  2 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  18F-FDG-PET/CT Angiography for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis.

Authors:  A Roque; M N Pizzi; H Cuéllar-Calàbria; S Aguadé-Bruix
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  High performances of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT in cardiac implantable device infections: A study of 40 patients.

Authors:  Ghoufrane Tlili; Sana Amraoui; Sana Amroui; Charles Mesguich; Annalisa Rivière; Pierre Bordachar; Elif Hindié; Laurence Bordenave
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Mahmood; Ayse Tuba Kendi; Saira Farid; Saira Ajmal; Geoffrey B Johnson; Larry M Baddour; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Paul A Friedman; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  The performance of quantitation methods in the evaluation of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection: A technical review.

Authors:  Matthew J Memmott; Jacqueline James; Ian S Armstrong; Deborah Tout; Fozia Ahmed
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the infection of heart.

Authors:  Eunjung Kong
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2020-10-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.