| Literature DB >> 25112435 |
Tadeusz Włostowski1, Paweł Kozłowski, Barbara Laszkiewicz-Tiszczenko, Ewa Oleńska, Olgierd Aleksandrowicz.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were (1) to determine cadmium (Cd) accumulation in the midgut gland of a land snail Helix pomatia L. inhabiting residential areas of the 14 largest cities in Poland, and (2) to examine whether the accumulated Cd exerted any toxic effects. The average accumulation of Cd in the midgut gland of snails, weighing 16-18 g, ranged from 7.00 to 87.3 µg/g dry weight (0.06-0.77 µmol/g) and differed significantly among animals from the various urban areas. This difference in Cd accumulation was not related to city population, but was associated with the topsoil Cd (R(2) = 0.868, p < 0.0001). The tissue Cd was not found to produce toxicity (histopathology, programmed cell death, lipofuscin formation or lipid peroxidation), probably due to the induction of sufficiently high quantities of metallothionein and glutathione, well-known protective molecules.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25112435 PMCID: PMC4186977 DOI: 10.1007/s00128-014-1346-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol ISSN: 0007-4861 Impact factor: 2.151
Fig. 1Map of Poland showing location of the 14 sampling areas. Sizes of black circles indicate relative cadmium accumulation in the midgut gland of Helix pomatia snails under study
Fig. 2Representative photomicrograph of a midgut gland section from the Helix pomatia snail under study. Note the residual bodies (lipofuscin granules) within large vacuoles of excretory cells (arrows) and the condensed body (programmed cell death) situated in a basophilic cell (arrow head). Scale bar 20 µm
The levels of soil cadmium (Cd), and Cd level, metallothionein, glutathione, lipid peroxidation (TBARS) and residual bodies in the midgut gland of Helix pomatia snails from the largest cities in Poland
| City | Number of inhabitants (thousand)* | Soil Cd (µg/kg) | Midgut gland Cd (µg/g) | Metallothionein (µg Cd/g) | Glutathione (µmol/g) | TBARS (nmol/g) | Residual bodies** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olsztyn | 176 | 100 ± 30a | 7.00 ± 3.19a | 8.80 ± 3.40a | 0.17 ± 0,17a | 257 ± 43a | 3.2 ± 0.6a |
| Rzeszow | 178 | 230 ± 50ab | 28.4 ± 13.2b | 30.0 ± 13.0b | 0.34 ± 0.30a | 232 ± 38a | 3.3 ± 0.7a |
| Kielce | 204 | 390 ± 60b | 33.6 ± 13.0b | 37.2 ± 14.0b | 0.31 ± 0.20a | 153 ± 48b | 6.0 ± 0.8b |
| Torun | 205 | 140 ± 30a | 17.5 ± 3.40c | 19,4 ± 5.60c | 0.31 ± 0.27a | 288 ± 46a | 3.4 ± 0.5a |
| Bialystok | 295 | 110 ± 40a | 7.75 ± 3.38a | 10.8 ± 3.00a | 0.27 ± 0.17a | 158 ± 27b | 3.8 ± 0.5a |
| Katowice | 307 | 1,500 ± 450c | 87.3 ± 17.4d | 99.2 ± 16.0d | 0.68 ± 00.7b | 215 ± 26a | 6.0 ± 2.0b |
| Lublin | 348 | 160 ± 40ab | 16.0 ± 3.00c | 17.6 ± 2.40c | 0.41 ± 0.31ab | 231 ± 41a | 6.2 ± 0.7b |
| Szczecin | 406 | 380 ± 50b | 24.4 ± 10.8bc | 25.3 ± 11.0bc | 0.24 ± 0.17a | 232 ± 36a | 4.1 ± 1.5ab |
| Gdansk | 457 | 170 ± 50ab | 9.11 ± 5.80a | 10.1 ± 6.20ac | 0.20 ± 0.17a | 253 ± 58a | 5.1 ± 1.6ab |
| Poznan | 552 | 140 ± 30a | 30.7 ± 9.40b | 32.2 ± 9.70b | 0.20 ± 0.16a | 211 ± 71ab | 6.4 ± 1.8b |
| Wroclaw | 633 | 270 ± 90ab | 21.2 ± 12.4abc | 22.6 ± 13.0abc | 0.37 ± 0.31ab | 254 ± 48a | 2.5 ± 1.3a |
| Lodz | 737 | 170 ± 30ab | 26.5 ± 13.7bc | 27.4 ± 13.6bc | 0.41 ± 0.37ab | 165 ± 21b | 5.4 ± 1.5ab |
| Cracow | 756 | 380 ± 80b | 35.5 ± 7.20b | 38.6 ± 10.0b | 0.92 ± 0.41b | 218 ± 13a | 4.2 ± 1.0a |
| Warsaw | 1,720 | 210 ± 80ab | 9.67 ± 3.41a | 10.3 ± 4.50ac | 0.41 ± 0.15a | 163 ± 23b | 5.0 ± 1.0ab |
Data are presented as mean ± SD for n = 10 (gland) and n = 3 (soil). Means in the same column marked with a different superscript letter are significantly different (p < 0.05) (ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test)
* After GUS (2011)
** Number of cells with lipofuscin granules/microscopic field
Fig. 3The relationship of the topsoil Cd to the midgut gland Cd in Helix pomatia snails
The correlation between cadmium, and metallothionein (MT), glutathione (GSH), lipid peroxidation (TBARS) and residual bodies (RB) in the midgut gland of Helix pomatia snails (n = 14, means from Table 1 were compared)
| Comparison | Equation | R2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| MT versus Cd | MT = − 0.88 + 1.10 × Cd | 0.98 | 0.0000 |
| GSH versus Cd | GSH = 0.23 + 0.006 × Cd | 0.46 | 0.0296 |
| TBARS versus Cd | TBARS = 221 − 0.18 × Cd | 0.008 | 0.7660 |
| RB versus Cd | RB = 3.9 + 0.02 × Cd | 0.14 | 0.1877 |