Literature DB >> 25112216

Cell penetration: scope and limitations by the application of cell-penetrating peptides.

Siegmund Reissmann1.   

Abstract

The penetration of polar or badly soluble compounds through a cell membrane into live cells requires mechanical support or chemical helpers. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are very promising chemical helpers. Because of their low cytotoxicity and final degradation to amino acids, they are particularly favored in in vivo studies and for clinical applications. Clearly, the future of CPP research is bright; however, the required optimization studies for each drug require considerable individualized attention. Thus, CPPs are not the philosopher's stone. As of today, a large number of such transporter peptides with very different sequences have been identified. These have different uptake mechanisms and can transport different cargos. Intracellular concentrations of cargos can reach a low micromole range and are able to influence intracellular reactions. Internalized ribonucleic acids such as small interfering RNA (siRNA) and mimics of RNA such as peptide nucleic acids, morpholino nucleic acids, and triesters of oligonucleotides can influence transcription and translation. Despite the highly efficient internalization of antibodies, enzymes, and other protein factors, as well as siRNA and RNA mimics, the uptake and stabile insertion of DNA into the genome of the host cells remain substantially challenging. This review describes a wide array of differing CPPs, cargos, cell lines, and tissues. The application of CPPs is compared with electroporation, magnetofection, lipofection, viral vectors, dendrimers, and nanoparticles, including commercially available products. The limitations of CPPs include low cell and tissue selectivity of the first generation and the necessity for formation of fusion proteins, conjugates, or noncovalent complexes to different cargos and of cargo release from intracellular vesicles. Furthermore, the noncovalent complexes require a strong molar excess of CPPs, and extensive experimentation is required to determine the most optimal CPP for any given cargo and cell type. Yet to predict which CPP is optimal for any given target remains a complex question. More recently, there have been promising developments: the enhancement of cell specificity using activatable CPPs, specific transport into cell organelles by insertion of corresponding localization sequences, and the transport of drugs through blood-brain barriers, through the conjunctiva of eyes, skin, and into nerve cells. Proteins, siRNA, and mimics of oligonucleotides can be efficiently transported into cells and have been tested for treatment of certain diseases. The recent state of the art in CPP research is discussed together with the overall scope, limitations, and some recommendations for future research directions.
Copyright © 2014 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA mimics; activatable CPPs; amino acid sequences; antibodies; azurin; cargos proteins; cell- and tissue selectivity; cell-penetrating peptides; cellular uptake process; conformations; coupling to dendrimers; enzymes; intracellular concentrations; intracellular trafficking; maurocalcine; multifunctional nanoparticles; oncogenase; pH/pO2-sensitive CPPs; preclinical and clinical studies; siRNA; uptake efficiency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25112216     DOI: 10.1002/psc.2672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pept Sci        ISSN: 1075-2617            Impact factor:   1.905


  61 in total

1.  Endosomal escape efficiency of fusogenic B18 and B55 peptides fused with anti-EGFR single chain Fv as estimated by nuclear translocation.

Authors:  Keisuke Niikura; Kenichi Horisawa; Nobuhide Doi
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.387

2.  Corneal Penetrating Elastin-Like Polypeptide Carriers.

Authors:  Eric M George; Fakhri Mahdi; Omar C Logue; Grant G Robinson; Gene L Bidwell
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Designing Cell-Permeable Macrocyclic Peptides.

Authors:  George Appiah Kubi; Patrick G Dougherty; Dehua Pei
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2019

Review 4.  Methods for Intracellular Delivery of Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Sueden O Souza; Rafael B Lira; Cássia R A Cunha; Beate S Santos; Adriana Fontes; Goreti Pereira
Journal:  Top Curr Chem (Cham)       Date:  2021-01-05

5.  Non-covalent Encapsulation of siRNA with Cell-Penetrating Peptides.

Authors:  Martina Tuttolomondo; Henrik J Ditzel
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  A kidney-selective biopolymer for targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Gene L Bidwell; Fakhri Mahdi; Qingmei Shao; Omar C Logue; Jamarius P Waller; Caleb Reese; Alejandro R Chade
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2016-10-26

Review 7.  Advances in therapeutic bacterial antisense biotechnology.

Authors:  John P Hegarty; David B Stewart
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Bacterium-Derived Cell-Penetrating Peptides Deliver Gentamicin To Kill Intracellular Pathogens.

Authors:  Marta Gomarasca; Thaynan F C Martins; Lilo Greune; Philip R Hardwidge; M Alexander Schmidt; Christian Rüter
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Peptide internalization enabled by folding: triple helical cell-penetrating peptides.

Authors:  Aparna Shinde; Katie M Feher; Chloe Hu; Katarzyna Slowinska
Journal:  J Pept Sci       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 1.905

10.  Protein kinase Cɛ activity regulates mGluR5 surface expression in the rat nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Marek Schwendt; M Foster Olive
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.