Trisha F Hue1, Steven R Cummings2, Jane A Cauley3, Douglas C Bauer1, Kristine E Ensrud4, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor5, Dennis M Black1. 1. San Francisco Coordinating Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco. 2. San Francisco Coordinating Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco2California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco. 3. Center for Aging and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 5. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Studies have shown that bisphosphonates may have antitumor and antimetastatic properties. Recently, observational studies have suggested a possible protective effect of bisphosphonates on breast cancer, but the effect of bisphosphonate use on risk of breast cancer has not been tested in randomized trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of postmenopausal breast cancer incidence and bisphosphonate use using data from 2 randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) randomly assigned 6459 women aged 55 to 81 years toalendronate or placebofor a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. The Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence With Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) randomly assigned 7765 women aged 65 to 89 years to annual intravenouszoledronic acid or placebofor a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. Data were collected at clinical centers in the United States (FIT and HORIZON-PFT) and in Asia and the Pacific, Europe, North America, and South America (HORIZON-PFT). Women, in either study, with recurrent breast cancer or who reported a history of breast cancer were excluded from analyses. In each trial, a blinded review was conducted of each cancer adverse event report to verify incident invasive breast cancer cases. The primary analysis compared events in the active vs placebo group using a log-rank test. INTERVENTION: Alendronate vs placebo (FIT) or zoledronic acid vs placebo (HORIZON-PFT). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hazard ratio for incident breast cancer in the bisphosphonate treatment group compared to the placebo group. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of breast cancer in FIT: 1.5% (n = 46) in the placebo group and 1.8% (n = 57) in the alendronate group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 0.84-1.83]). In HORIZON-PFT, there was also no significant difference: 0.8% (n = 29) in the placebo group and 0.9% (n = 33) in the zoledronic acid group (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.70-1.89]). There was also no significant difference when the data from FIT and HORIZON-PFT were pooled (HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.89-1.63]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These 2 randomized clinical trials do not support the findings from observational research. Contrary to the results from observational studies, we found that 3 to 4 years of bisphosphonate treatment did not decrease the risk of invasive postmenopausal breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00049829 (HORIZON-PFT).
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Studies have shown that bisphosphonates may have antitumor and antimetastatic properties. Recently, observational studies have suggested a possible protective effect of bisphosphonates on breast cancer, but the effect of bisphosphonate use on risk of breast cancer has not been tested in randomized trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship of postmenopausal breast cancer incidence and bisphosphonate use using data from 2 randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) randomly assigned 6459 women aged 55 to 81 years to alendronate or placebo for a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. The Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence With Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) randomly assigned 7765 women aged 65 to 89 years to annual intravenous zoledronic acid or placebo for a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. Data were collected at clinical centers in the United States (FIT and HORIZON-PFT) and in Asia and the Pacific, Europe, North America, and South America (HORIZON-PFT). Women, in either study, with recurrent breast cancer or who reported a history of breast cancer were excluded from analyses. In each trial, a blinded review was conducted of each cancer adverse event report to verify incident invasive breast cancer cases. The primary analysis compared events in the active vs placebo group using a log-rank test. INTERVENTION: Alendronate vs placebo (FIT) or zoledronic acid vs placebo (HORIZON-PFT). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hazard ratio for incident breast cancer in the bisphosphonate treatment group compared to the placebo group. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of breast cancer in FIT: 1.5% (n = 46) in the placebo group and 1.8% (n = 57) in the alendronate group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 0.84-1.83]). In HORIZON-PFT, there was also no significant difference: 0.8% (n = 29) in the placebo group and 0.9% (n = 33) in the zoledronic acid group (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.70-1.89]). There was also no significant difference when the data from FIT and HORIZON-PFT were pooled (HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.89-1.63]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These 2 randomized clinical trials do not support the findings from observational research. Contrary to the results from observational studies, we found that 3 to 4 years of bisphosphonate treatment did not decrease the risk of invasive postmenopausal breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00049829 (HORIZON-PFT).
Authors: Chris R Cardwell; Christian C Abnet; Philip Veal; Carmel M Hughes; Marie M Cantwell; Liam J Murray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2012-01-11 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: E Barrett-Connor; J E Mueller; D G von Mühlen; G A Laughlin; D L Schneider; D J Sartoris Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1989-12-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: R Coleman; R de Boer; H Eidtmann; A Llombart; N Davidson; P Neven; G von Minckwitz; H P Sleeboom; J Forbes; C Barrios; A Frassoldati; I Campbell; O Paija; N Martin; A Modi; N Bundred Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: T L Bush; E Barrett-Connor; L D Cowan; M H Criqui; R B Wallace; C M Suchindran; H A Tyroler; B M Rifkind Journal: Circulation Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jacques E Rossouw; Garnet L Anderson; Ross L Prentice; Andrea Z LaCroix; Charles Kooperberg; Marcia L Stefanick; Rebecca D Jackson; Shirley A A Beresford; Barbara V Howard; Karen C Johnson; Jane Morley Kotchen; Judith Ockene Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: T J Key; P N Appleby; G K Reeves; A Roddam; J F Dorgan; C Longcope; F Z Stanczyk; H E Stephenson; R T Falk; R Miller; A Schatzkin; D S Allen; I S Fentiman; T J Key; D Y Wang; M Dowsett; H V Thomas; S E Hankinson; P Toniolo; A Akhmedkhanov; K Koenig; R E Shore; A Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; F Berrino; P Muti; A Micheli; V Krogh; S Sieri; V Pala; E Venturelli; G Secreto; E Barrett-Connor; G A Laughlin; M Kabuto; S Akiba; R G Stevens; K Neriishi; C E Land; J A Cauley; L H Kuller; S R Cummings; K J Helzlsouer; A J Alberg; T L Bush; G W Comstock; G B Gordon; S R Miller; C Longcope Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-08-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Robert A Adler; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Douglas C Bauer; Pauline M Camacho; Bart L Clarke; Gregory A Clines; Juliet E Compston; Matthew T Drake; Beatrice J Edwards; Murray J Favus; Susan L Greenspan; Ross McKinney; Robert J Pignolo; Deborah E Sellmeyer Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Polly A Newcomb; Michael N Passarelli; Amanda I Phipps; Garnet L Anderson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Gloria Y F Ho; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Rowan T Chlebowski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-02-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nicholas A Zumwalde; Jill D Haag; Deepak Sharma; Jennifer A Mirrielees; Lee G Wilke; Michael N Gould; Jenny E Gumperz Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2016-01-25