Idil Gunes Tatar1, Mehmet Akif Teber2, Torel Ogur3, Aydın Kurt4, Baki Hekimoglu4. 1. Diskapi Training and Research Hospital, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey. idilttr@yahoo.com. 2. Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Department of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey. 4. Diskapi Training and Research Hospital, Department Of Radiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice in end-stage renal disease. Chronic allograft dysfunction is the leading cause of chronic allograft failure. Surveillance biopsy is the only reliable tool to detect early fibrosis in the allograft. There is a need for non-invasive methods for the detection of early development of renal allograft fibrosis. AIMS: To analyze the reliability of sonographic elasticity index and resistive index measurements in the evaluation of renal transplant fibrosis using linear and convex transducers according to segmental anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elasticity index and resistive index were measured in 28 renal transplants and correlated with clinical prognostic parameters. Donor age above 50 years old, post transplantation time over 60 months and serum creatinine level above 1.5 mg/dl were defined as poor prognostic parameters. RESULTS: Renal transplant recipients with serum creatinine level above 1.5 mg/dl demonstrated higher mean elasticity index (p=0.006) with a convex probe and higher elasticity index in the middle segments both with a convex and a matrix linear probe (p=0.026, p=0.001). Renal transplant recipients with post-transplantation time of 60 months and more demonstrated higher resistive index values in the middle segments (p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Convex probe was able to detect the changes in mean stiffness better than the matrix linear probe. The measurements from subsegments might suggest that diffuse changes in stiffness can truly be detected in the middle segments or that fibrotic processes start from the middle segments of the renal transplants. Further studies correlated with histopathology are required to validate the findings.
BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice in end-stage renal disease. Chronic allograft dysfunction is the leading cause of chronic allograft failure. Surveillance biopsy is the only reliable tool to detect early fibrosis in the allograft. There is a need for non-invasive methods for the detection of early development of renal allograft fibrosis. AIMS: To analyze the reliability of sonographic elasticity index and resistive index measurements in the evaluation of renal transplant fibrosis using linear and convex transducers according to segmental anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Elasticity index and resistive index were measured in 28 renal transplants and correlated with clinical prognostic parameters. Donor age above 50 years old, post transplantation time over 60 months and serum creatinine level above 1.5 mg/dl were defined as poor prognostic parameters. RESULTS: Renal transplant recipients with serum creatinine level above 1.5 mg/dl demonstrated higher mean elasticity index (p=0.006) with a convex probe and higher elasticity index in the middle segments both with a convex and a matrix linear probe (p=0.026, p=0.001). Renal transplant recipients with post-transplantation time of 60 months and more demonstrated higher resistive index values in the middle segments (p=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Convex probe was able to detect the changes in mean stiffness better than the matrix linear probe. The measurements from subsegments might suggest that diffuse changes in stiffness can truly be detected in the middle segments or that fibrotic processes start from the middle segments of the renal transplants. Further studies correlated with histopathology are required to validate the findings.
Authors: Francesco Maria Drudi; Vito Cantisani; Antonio Granata; Flavia Angelini; Daniela Messineo; Carlo De Felice; Evaristo Ettorre Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2019-06-13
Authors: Sorana D Bolboacă; Florin Ioan Elec; Alina Daciana Elec; Adriana Milena Muntean; Mihai Adrian Socaciu; Gheorghita Iacob; Răzvan Zaro; Alexandra-Ioana Andrieș; Ramona Maria Bădulescu; Radu Mihai Ignat; Mihaela Iancu; Radu Ion Badea Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2020-01-13