| Literature DB >> 25110744 |
Muhamad Nazri Borhan1, Deprizon Syamsunur2, Norliza Mohd Akhir3, Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid3, Amiruddin Ismail4, Riza Atiq Rahmat3.
Abstract
Putrajaya is a new federal administrative capital of Malaysia which has been set to achieve a 70% share of all travels by public transport in the city area. However, the current modal split between the public transport and private transport is 15:85. In order to understand travelers' willingness to use the public transport, a conceptual model has been developed to determine the factors that affect them to use the public transport instead of travelling in their own cars. Various variables such as service quality, environmental impact, attitude, and behavior intention were analyzed and tested using structural equation model (SEM). Results indicate that the service quality and attitude are found to have positive effects on the behavioral intention of taking the public transport. Other than this, this study also shows that the service quality and environmental impact have some positive influences on the attitude to using the public transport. However, environmental impact has no significant, positive, and direct effect on behavioral intention. The results of this study demonstrate that the model that was developed is useful in predicting the public transport and it could provide a more complete understanding of behavioral intention towards public transport use.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25110744 PMCID: PMC4119717 DOI: 10.1155/2014/784145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1The conceptual model.
Demographic information.
| Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ||
| 30 and below | 193 | 66.6 |
| 31–40 | 68 | 23.4 |
| 40–49 | 14 | 4.8 |
| 50 and above | 15 | 5.2 |
| Total |
|
|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 126 | 43.4 |
| Female | 164 | 56.6 |
| Total |
|
|
| Education | ||
| High school | 98 | 33.8 |
| Diploma | 101 | 34.8 |
| University | 67 | 23.1 |
| Postgraduate degree | 24 | 8.3 |
| Total |
|
|
Factor analysis of service quality.
| Items | Factor loading | Eigenvalue | Variance explained (%) | Cronbach's | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QS1 | Service reliability | 0.792 | 6.025 | 66.946 | 0.937 |
| QS2 | Safety at bus stops/terminal | 0.853 | |||
| QS3 | Onboard safety | 0.898 | |||
| QS4 | Customer service | 0.905 | |||
| QS5 | Information | 0.886 | |||
| QS6 | Vehicle cleanliness | 0.832 | |||
| QS7 | Ticket selling network | 0.768 | |||
| QS8 | Luggage storage area | 0.813 | |||
| QS9 | Special bus lane | 0.810 | |||
|
| |||||
| Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy = 0.911. | |||||
| Bartlett's test of sphericity = 2564.544 (d.f. = 136, | |||||
Standardized loadings and reliability.
| Constructs and items | Standardized loading | Contruct realibility | AVE | Cronbach's |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service quality (SQ) | 0.881 | 0.50 | 0.94 | |
| SQ1 | 0.547 ( | |||
| SQ2 | 0.888 ( | |||
| SQ3 | 0.984 ( | |||
| SQ4 | 0.917 ( | |||
| SQ5 | 0.888 ( | |||
| SQ6 | 0.698 ( | |||
| SQ7 | 0.649 ( | |||
| SQ8 | 0.523 ( | |||
| SQ9 | 0.630 ( | |||
| Enviroment (ENV) | 0.763 | 0.62 | 0.82 | |
| ENV1 | 0.875 ( | |||
| ENV2 | 0.793 ( | |||
| Attitude (ATT) | 0.905 | 0.76 | 0.91 | |
| ATT3 | 0.924 ( | |||
| ATT4 | 0.943 ( | |||
| ATT5 | 0.809 ( | |||
| Behavioral intention (B.INT) | 0.797 | 0.67 | 0.84 | |
| B.INT1 | 0.895 ( | |||
| B.INT2 | 0.811 ( |
Means, standard deviations, and correlations.
| Mean | STD | SQ | ENV | ATT | B.INT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQ | 5.60 | 1.23 | 1 | |||
| ENV | 5.05 | 1.24 | 0.29 | 1 | ||
| ATT | 4.98 | 1.40 | 0.53 | 0.29 | 1 | |
| B.INT | 4.56 | 1.55 | 0.27 | 0.37 | 0.58 | 1 |
Note: all correlations were significant at P < .01.
Figure 2Result of the research model.
Hypothesis tests.
| Path relationships | Structural coefficients |
| Test result |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1: quality of service → attitude | 0.45 | 4.64*** | Support |
| H2: environment → attitude | 0.32 | 3.90** | Support |
| H3: quality of service → behavioral intention | 0.13 | 2.18* | Support |
| H4: environment → behavioral intention | 0.10 | 1.31 | Reject |
| H5: attitude → behavioral intention | 0.50 | 6.45*** | Support |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Direct, indirect, and total effects of relationships.
| Path relationships | Direct effect | Indirect effect | Total effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude → behavioral intention | 0.50 | — | 0.50 |
| Environment → attitude | 0.32 | — | 0.32 |
| Quality of service → attitude | 0.45 | — | 0.45 |
| Quality of service → behavioral intention | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.36 |
| Environment → behavioral intention | — | 0.16 | 0.16 |