Literature DB >> 25110339

Extrapleural pneumonectomy after induction chemotherapy: perioperative outcome in 251 mesothelioma patients from three high-volume institutions.

Olivia Lauk1, Mir Alireza Hoda2, Marc de Perrot3, Martina Friess1, Thomas Klikovits2, Walter Klepetko2, Shaf Keshavjee3, Walter Weder1, Isabelle Opitz4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several publications have suggested that induction chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients is associated with exceedingly high morbidity and mortality, and the role of EPP is controversially debated. The present retrospective study analyzed the perioperative outcome in 251 consecutively treated patients at three high-volume mesothelioma centers.
METHODS: 251 MPM patients completed EPP after platinum-based induction chemotherapy at three institutions for thoracic surgery over more than 10 years. The rates of 30-day and 90-day mortality and of major morbidities (pulmonary embolism, postoperative bleeding, acute respiratory distress syndrome, empyema, bronchopleural fistula (BPF), chylothorax, patch failure) were recorded. Perioperative outcome was correlated to risk factors such as smoking history (pack years), age at operation, body mass index, spirometry results, C-reactive protein, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, chemotherapy regimen used, blood loss during operation, duration of operation, and characteristics of the tumor (laterality, histologic subtype, pT and pN stage) to find factors predicting 30-day and 90-day mortality or major morbidity.
RESULTS: The overall 30-day mortality was 5%. Within 90 days after operation, 8% of the patients died. The rates of 30-day and 90-day mortality were significantly higher in patients with high preoperative C-reactive protein values (p=0.001 and p<0.0005). The spirometry values forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity exhaled (FVCex) were both associated with 30-day and 90-day mortality (p=0.001 and p<0.0005; and p=0.002 and p<0.0005). Major morbidity occurred in 30% of the patients, significantly more often after right-sided EPP (p=0.01) and after longer operations (p<0.0005). Empyema (p<0.0005) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (p=0.02) were associated with longer duration of operation.
CONCLUSIONS: EPP after induction chemotherapy is a demanding procedure but can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality if patients are well selected and treated at dedicated high-volume MPM centers.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25110339     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  13 in total

1.  Impact of Age on Long-Term Outcomes of Surgery for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Brandon W Yan; Robert Ryan Meyerhoff; Shakir M Saud; Brian C Gulack; Paul J Speicher; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; David H Harpole; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 2.  Extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) vs. pleurectomy decortication (P/D).

Authors:  Hasan Fevzi Batirel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

Review 3.  A nuanced view of extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Isabelle Opitz; Walter Weder
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

4.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: some progress, but still a long way from cure.

Authors:  Loic Lang-Lazdunski
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Landmark Trials in the Surgical Management of Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Taylor Kantor; Elliot Wakeam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Hedy L Kindler; Nofisat Ismaila; Samuel G Armato; Raphael Bueno; Mary Hesdorffer; Thierry Jahan; Clyde Michael Jones; Markku Miettinen; Harvey Pass; Andreas Rimner; Valerie Rusch; Daniel Sterman; Anish Thomas; Raffit Hassan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Chest pain and recurrent chylothorax: an unusual presentation of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  David R Darley; Emily Granger; Allan R Glanville
Journal:  Respirol Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-15

8.  Management of malignant pleural mesothelioma-part 2: therapeutic approaches : Consensus of the Austrian Mesothelioma Interest Group (AMIG).

Authors:  Mir Alireza Hoda; Thomas Klikovits; Madeleine Arns; Karin Dieckmann; Sabine Zöchbauer-Müller; Christian Geltner; Bernhard Baumgartner; Peter Errhalt; Barbara Machan; Wolfgang Pohl; Jörg Hutter; Josef Eckmayr; Michael Studnicka; Martin Flicker; Peter Cerkl; Walter Klepetko
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Management of malignant pleural mesothelioma - part 3 : Data from the Austrian Mesothelioma Interest Group (AMIG) database.

Authors:  Thomas Klikovits; Mir Alireza Hoda; Yawen Dong; Madeleine Arns; Bernhard Baumgartner; Peter Errhalt; Christian Geltner; Barbara Machan; Wolfgang Pohl; Jörg Hutter; Josef Eckmayr; Michael Studnicka; Martin Flicker; Peter Cerkl; Klaus Kirchbacher; Walter Klepetko
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 10.  Chemotherapy options versus "novel" therapies: how should we treat patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Maria J Disselhorst; Paul Baas
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.