Michael T Treadway1, Michael L Waskom2, Daniel G Dillon1, Avram J Holmes3, Min Tae M Park4, M Mallar Chakravarty5, Sunny J Dutra6, Frida E Polli7, Dan V Iosifescu8, Maurizio Fava9, John D E Gabrieli7, Diego A Pizzagalli10. 1. Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Kimel Family Imaging-Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada. 5. Kimel Family Imaging-Genetics Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 6. Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 7. Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 8. Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 9. Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 10. Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts. Electronic address: dap@mclean.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies of illness progression in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) indicate that the onset of subsequent depressive episodes becomes increasingly decoupled from external stressors. A possible mechanism underlying this phenomenon is that multiple episodes induce long-lasting neurobiological changes that confer increased risk for recurrence. Prior morphometric studies have frequently reported volumetric reductions in patients with MDD--especially in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the hippocampus--but few studies have investigated whether these changes are exacerbated by prior episodes. METHODS: In a sample of 103 medication-free patients with depression and control subjects with no history of depression, structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed to examine relationships between number of prior episodes, current stress, hippocampal subfield volume and cortical thickness. Volumetric analyses of the hippocampus were performed using a recently validated subfield segmentation approach, and cortical thickness estimates were obtained using vertex-based methods. Participants were grouped on the basis of the number of prior depressive episodes and current depressive diagnosis. RESULTS: Number of prior episodes was associated with both lower reported stress levels and reduced volume in the dentate gyrus. Cortical thinning of the left mPFC was associated with a greater number of prior depressive episodes but not current depressive diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings are consistent with preclinical models suggesting that the dentate gyrus and mPFC are especially vulnerable to stress exposure and provide evidence for morphometric changes that are consistent with stress-sensitization models of recurrence in MDD.
BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies of illness progression in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) indicate that the onset of subsequent depressive episodes becomes increasingly decoupled from external stressors. A possible mechanism underlying this phenomenon is that multiple episodes induce long-lasting neurobiological changes that confer increased risk for recurrence. Prior morphometric studies have frequently reported volumetric reductions in patients with MDD--especially in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the hippocampus--but few studies have investigated whether these changes are exacerbated by prior episodes. METHODS: In a sample of 103 medication-free patients with depression and control subjects with no history of depression, structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed to examine relationships between number of prior episodes, current stress, hippocampal subfield volume and cortical thickness. Volumetric analyses of the hippocampus were performed using a recently validated subfield segmentation approach, and cortical thickness estimates were obtained using vertex-based methods. Participants were grouped on the basis of the number of prior depressive episodes and current depressive diagnosis. RESULTS: Number of prior episodes was associated with both lower reported stress levels and reduced volume in the dentate gyrus. Cortical thinning of the left mPFC was associated with a greater number of prior depressive episodes but not current depressive diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, these findings are consistent with preclinical models suggesting that the dentate gyrus and mPFC are especially vulnerable to stress exposure and provide evidence for morphometric changes that are consistent with stress-sensitization models of recurrence in MDD.
Authors: M Mallar Chakravarty; Patrick Steadman; Matthijs C van Eede; Rebecca D Calcott; Victoria Gu; Philip Shaw; Armin Raznahan; D Louis Collins; Jason P Lerch Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jon Pipitone; Min Tae M Park; Julie Winterburn; Tristram A Lett; Jason P Lerch; Jens C Pruessner; Martin Lepage; Aristotle N Voineskos; M Mallar Chakravarty Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Amanda K Y Mak; Michael M C Wong; Shi-Hui Han; Tatia M C Lee Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-07-19 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: P Cédric M P Koolschijn; Neeltje E M van Haren; Gerty J L M Lensvelt-Mulders; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; René S Kahn Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: D Arnone; S McKie; R Elliott; G Juhasz; E J Thomas; D Downey; S Williams; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-06 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Alize J Ferrari; Fiona J Charlson; Rosana E Norman; Scott B Patten; Greg Freedman; Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos; Harvey A Whiteford Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Joseph Therriault; S Wang; S Mathotaarachchi; Tharick A Pascoal; M Parent; T Beaudry; M Shin; Benedet Al; M S Kang; K P Ng; C Dansereau; M T M Park; V Fonov; F Carbonell; E Zimmer; M Mallar Chakravarty; P Bellec; S Gauthier; P Rosa-Neto Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2019-06-22 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Maria Ironside; Roee Admon; Stephanie A Maddox; Malavika Mehta; Samuel Douglas; David P Olson; Diego A Pizzagalli Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Aristotle N Voineskos; Julie L Winterburn; Daniel Felsky; Jon Pipitone; Tarek K Rajji; Benoit H Mulsant; M Mallar Chakravarty Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sejal Patel; Min Tae M Park; Gabriel A Devenyi; Raihaan Patel; Mario Masellis; Jo Knight; M Mallar Chakravarty Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jie Yang; Mengru Zhang; Hongshik Ahn; Qing Zhang; Tony B Jin; Ien Li; Matthew Nemesure; Nandita Joshi; Haoran Jiang; Jeffrey M Miller; Robert Todd Ogden; Eva Petkova; Matthew S Milak; Mary Elizabeth Sublette; Gregory M Sullivan; Madhukar H Trivedi; Myrna Weissman; Patrick J McGrath; Maurizio Fava; Benji T Kurian; Diego A Pizzagalli; Crystal M Cooper; Melvin McInnis; Maria A Oquendo; Joseph John Mann; Ramin V Parsey; Christine DeLorenzo Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sarah M Szymkowicz; Molly E McLaren; Andrew O'Shea; Adam J Woods; Stephen D Anton; Vonetta M Dotson Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Date: 2016-10-02 Impact factor: 2.730
Authors: Marc S Lener; Prantik Kundu; Edmund Wong; Kaitlin E Dewilde; Cheuk Y Tang; Priti Balchandani; James W Murrough Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.839