Literature DB >> 25109557

The management of bulbar urethral stricture disease before referral for definitive repair: have practice patterns changed?

Michael A Granieri1, Andrew C Peterson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of patients with bulbar urethral stricture disease before referral for definitive urethroplasty and determine if practice patterns have changed with respect to endoscopic interventions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an institutional review board-approved retrospective review and recorded patient demographics, stricture-related information, and all procedures performed for bulbar urethral stricture disease before initial presentation at our institution. Included procedures were: UroLume stent (AMS, Minnetonka, MN), laser urethrotomy, direct visual urethrotomy (DVIU), and dilation of urethral stricture. Patients with prior urethroplasty were excluded. We compared the differences between procedures when stratified by stricture length.
RESULTS: We identified 363 men who underwent urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture disease from January 1996 to September 2011. Of the total, 235 men (65%) had a prior DVIU, whereas 65 of these men (28%) had multiple DVIUs. One hundred ninety-nine men (55%) had a prior dilation and 155 of these men (78%) had multiple dilations. The remaining procedures consisted of laser urethrotomy (6; 2%), and UroLume stent (4; 1%). Twenty-four patients (6%) had no procedures before referral. There was no statistically significant difference between numbers of prior procedures when stratified by stricture length. From 1996 to 2010, there was no appreciable change in number of procedures before referral, with ∼ 70% of patients with ≥ 2 prior procedures.
CONCLUSION: Our institution has not seen a measurable change in practice patterns before referral from 1996 to 2010. Future studies are needed to determine if the change in referral patterns in 2011 represents a future trend.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25109557     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy for recurrent urethral stricture in men: the OPEN RCT.

Authors:  Robert Pickard; Beatriz Goulao; Sonya Carnell; Jing Shen; Graeme MacLennan; John Norrie; Matt Breckons; Luke Vale; Paul Whybrow; Tim Rapley; Rebecca Forbes; Stephanie Currer; Mark Forrest; Jennifer Wilkinson; Elaine McColl; Daniela Andrich; Stewart Barclay; Jonathan Cook; Anthony Mundy; James N'Dow; Stephen Payne; Nick Watkin
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Socioeconomic and patient-related factors for the management of male urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Ryan A Dornbier; Eric J Kirshenbaum; Marc H Nelson; Robert H Blackwell; Gopal N Gupta; Ahmer V Farooq; Christopher M Gonzalez
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Use of Conjoint Analysis to Determine Patient Preferences for Surgical Treatment of Urethral Stricture Disease.

Authors:  Leslie Wilson; Tracy Kuo Lin; Lindsay A Hampson; Anna Oh; Jie Ting; Thomas Gaither; Isabel Allen; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  J Particip Med       Date:  2017-01-14

4.  Visual Internal Urethrotomy for Adult Male Urethral Stricture Has Poor Long-Term Results.

Authors:  Waleed Al Taweel; Raouf Seyam
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-10-01

5.  Endoscopic treatments prior to urethroplasty: trends in management of urethral stricture disease.

Authors:  Matthew J Moynihan; Bryan Voelzke; Jeremy Myers; Benjamin N Breyer; Bradley Erickson; Sean P Elliott; Nejd Alsikafi; Jill Buckley; Lee Zhao; Thomas Smith; Alex J Vanni
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.