Literature DB >> 25109525

Reducing risk of overdose with midazolam injection in adults: an evaluation of change in clinical practice to improve patient safety in England.

Chris Flood1, Linda Matthew, Rachel Marsh, Bhavesh Patel, Mariama Mansaray, Tara Lamont.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate potential reductions in risk associated with midazolam injection, a sedating medication, following a UK National Patient Safety Alert. This alert, 'Reducing risk of overdose with midazolam injection in adults', was sent to all National Health Service organizations as a Rapid Response Report detailing actions services should take to minimize risks.
METHOD: To evaluate any potential changes arising from this alert, a number of data sources were explored including reported incidents to a national reporting system for health care error, clinician survey and audit data, pharmaceutical purchasing patterns and feedback from National Health Service managers.
RESULTS: Prior to the Rapid Response Report, 498 incidents were received by the National Patient Safety Agency including three deaths. Post-implementation of the Rapid Response Report (June 2009), no incidents resulting in death or severe harm had been received. All organizations reported having completed the Rapid Response Report actions. Purchase and use of risk-prone, high-strength sedating midazolam by health care organizations decreased significantly as did the increased use of safer, lower strength doses (as recommended in the Rapid Response Report).
CONCLUSIONS: Organizations can achieve safer medication practices, better knowledge, awareness and implementation of national safer practice recommendations. Risks from inadvertent overdose of midazolam injection were reduced post-implementation of national recommendations. Ongoing monitoring of this particular adverse event will be required with a sustained patient safety message to health services to maintain awareness of the issue and reduction in the number of midazolam-related errors.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical guidelines; clinical safety; medical error

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25109525     DOI: 10.1111/jep.12228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  5 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of medication errors: the methodological difficulties.

Authors:  Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Impact of medicines regulatory risk communications in the UK on prescribing and clinical outcomes: Systematic review, time series analysis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Weatherburn; Bruce Guthrie; Tobias Dreischulte; Daniel R Morales
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Midazolam use for dental conscious sedation: how safe are we?

Authors:  Z Shehabi; C Flood; L Matthew
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Measuring the impact of medicines regulatory interventions - Systematic review and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Thomas Goedecke; Daniel R Morales; Alexandra Pacurariu; Xavier Kurz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Forensic Toxicological and Medico-Legal Evaluation in a Case of Incongruous Drug Administration in Terminal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Pascale Basilicata; Pasquale Giugliano; Giuseppe Vacchiano; Angela Simonelli; Rossella Guadagni; Angela Silvestre; Maria Pieri
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-12-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.