Literature DB >> 25109230

Twelve tips for increasing the defensibility of assessment decisions.

Richard B Hays1, Gary Hamlin, Linda Crane.   

Abstract

In an era of increasing scrutiny of the performance of graduates in the workplace, there can be frustrations when decisions about learners with borderline or poor performance in formal assessments are over-turned in appeal processes. This article addresses the approach to reducing the uncertainty about assessment decisions and surviving appeals.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25109230     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.943711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacy Preceptor Judgments of Student Performance and Behavior During Experiential Training.

Authors:  Kerry Wilbur; Kyle J Wilby; Shane Pawluk
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Nuance and Noise: Lessons Learned From Longitudinal Aggregated Assessment Data.

Authors:  Teresa M Chan; Jonathan Sherbino; Mathew Mercuri
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-12

3.  Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.

Authors:  Jane Holland; Robin O'Sullivan; Richard Arnett
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Fairness: the hidden challenge for competency-based postgraduate medical education programs.

Authors:  Colleen Y Colbert; Judith C French; Mary Elizabeth Herring; Elaine F Dannefer
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-10

5.  Quality assessment in undergraduate medical training: how to bridge the gap between what we do and what we should do.

Authors:  Hanneke Brits; Johan Bezuidenhout; Lynette Jean Van der Merwe
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-06-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.