J S Tsang1, S Vencken2, O Sharaf3, E Leen4, E W Kay4, D A McNamara5, J Deasy5, E D Mulligan2. 1. Department of Surgical Research, Connolly Hospital & RCSI, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: julianst@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Surgical Research, Connolly Hospital & RCSI, Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland. 3. Department of Pathology, UCD, Dublin, Ireland. 4. Department of Pathology, Beaumont Hospital & RCSI, Dublin, Ireland. 5. Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
AIM: In rectal cancer, not all tumours display a response to neoadjuvant treatment. An accurate predictor of response does not exist to guide patient-specific treatment. DNA methylation is a distinctive molecular pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis. Whether DNA methylation is altered by neoadjuvant treatment and a potential response predictor is unknown. We aimed to determine whether DNA methylation is altered by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to determine its role in predicting response to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three (n = 53) patients with locally advanced rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery were identified from the pathology databases of 2 tertiary referral centres over a 4-year period. Immunohistochemical staining of treatment specimens was carried out using the 5-Methylcytidine (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) antibody. Quantitative analysis of staining was performed using an automated image analysis platform. The modified tumour regression grading system was used to assess tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Seven (13%) patients showed complete pathological response while 46 (87%) patients were partial responders to neoadjuvant treatment. In 38 (72%) patients, significant reduction in methylation was observed in post-treatment resection specimens compared to pre-treatment specimens (171.5 vs 152.7, p = 0.01); in 15 (28%) patients, methylation was increased. Pre-treatment methylation correlated significantly with tumour regression (p < 0.001), T-stage (p = 0.005), and was able to predict complete and partial pathological responders (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CRT appears to alter the rectal cancer epigenome. The significant correlation between pre-treatment DNA methylation with tumour response suggests a potential role for methylation as a biomarker of response.
AIM: In rectal cancer, not all tumours display a response to neoadjuvant treatment. An accurate predictor of response does not exist to guide patient-specific treatment. DNA methylation is a distinctive molecular pathway in colorectal carcinogenesis. Whether DNA methylation is altered by neoadjuvant treatment and a potential response predictor is unknown. We aimed to determine whether DNA methylation is altered by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to determine its role in predicting response to treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three (n = 53) patients with locally advanced rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery were identified from the pathology databases of 2 tertiary referral centres over a 4-year period. Immunohistochemical staining of treatment specimens was carried out using the 5-Methylcytidine (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) antibody. Quantitative analysis of staining was performed using an automated image analysis platform. The modified tumour regression grading system was used to assess tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Seven (13%) patients showed complete pathological response while 46 (87%) patients were partial responders to neoadjuvant treatment. In 38 (72%) patients, significant reduction in methylation was observed in post-treatment resection specimens compared to pre-treatment specimens (171.5 vs 152.7, p = 0.01); in 15 (28%) patients, methylation was increased. Pre-treatment methylation correlated significantly with tumour regression (p < 0.001), T-stage (p = 0.005), and was able to predict complete and partial pathological responders (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CRT appears to alter the rectal cancer epigenome. The significant correlation between pre-treatment DNA methylation with tumour response suggests a potential role for methylation as a biomarker of response.
Authors: Alissa Greenbaum; David R Martin; Thèrése Bocklage; Ji-Hyun Lee; Scott A Ness; Ashwani Rajput Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Rory F Kokelaar; Huw G Jones; Jeremy Williamson; Namor Williams; A Paul Griffiths; John Beynon; Gareth J Jenkins; Dean A Harris Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: K Yokoi; K Yamashita; S Ishii; T Tanaka; N Nishizawa; A Tsutsui; H Miura; H Katoh; T Yamanashi; M Naito; T Sato; T Nakamura; M Watanabe Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Cigdem Selli; Arran K Turnbull; Dominic A Pearce; Ang Li; Anu Fernando; Jimi Wills; Lorna Renshaw; Jeremy S Thomas; J Michael Dixon; Andrew H Sims Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Martina Barchitta; Andrea Maugeri; Giovanni Li Destri; Guido Basile; Antonella Agodi Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Floris A Vuijk; Carlijn van de Water; Shannon Lent-van Vliet; Maxime J M van der Valk; Femke Simmer; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Iris D Nagtegaal; Denise E Hilling Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-09 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Azadeh Azizian; Ingo Epping; Frank Kramer; Peter Jo; Markus Bernhardt; Julia Kitz; Gabriela Salinas; Hendrik A Wolff; Marian Grade; Tim Beißbarth; B Michael Ghadimi; Jochen Gaedcke Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 5.923