Kimberly Cousins1, Jennie L Connor2, Kypros Kypri3. 1. Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. Electronic address: kim.cousins@otago.ac.nz. 2. Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. 3. School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building, 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High levels of drinking and alcohol-related problems are pervasive among university students in New Zealand and other high-income countries, where controls on alcohol availability and promotion are typically weak. Environmental interventions to reduce hazardous drinking and harm have shown promise in general populations, but require further evidence of effectiveness in university settings. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of a community liaison and security program, Campus Watch, on drinking patterns and alcohol-related harm among university students. METHODS: The study used a quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent control sites using before (2005) and after (2009) observations. Participants were full-time students aged 17-25 years selected randomly from the enrolment lists of six New Zealand universities. Changes in scores on the alcohol use disorders identification consumption scale (AUDIT-C) and alcohol-related harms at the intervention campus were compared with those at control campuses using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Compared to control campuses, AUDIT-C scores decreased in students at the intervention campus (β=-0.5, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.3). Campus Watch was associated with reductions in some harms (independent of its effect on drinking), such as aggression (aOR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.94), but not other harms, e.g., blackouts (aOR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.27). CONCLUSION: While not being focused on alcohol per se, Campus Watch reduced alcohol consumption and some related harms. Such programs may be useful in similar environments where controls on alcohol availability and promotion cannot be affected and where informal controls are weak.
BACKGROUND: High levels of drinking and alcohol-related problems are pervasive among university students in New Zealand and other high-income countries, where controls on alcohol availability and promotion are typically weak. Environmental interventions to reduce hazardous drinking and harm have shown promise in general populations, but require further evidence of effectiveness in university settings. The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of a community liaison and security program, Campus Watch, on drinking patterns and alcohol-related harm among university students. METHODS: The study used a quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent control sites using before (2005) and after (2009) observations. Participants were full-time students aged 17-25 years selected randomly from the enrolment lists of six New Zealand universities. Changes in scores on the alcohol use disorders identification consumption scale (AUDIT-C) and alcohol-related harms at the intervention campus were compared with those at control campuses using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Compared to control campuses, AUDIT-C scores decreased in students at the intervention campus (β=-0.5, 95% CI: -0.6 to -0.3). Campus Watch was associated with reductions in some harms (independent of its effect on drinking), such as aggression (aOR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.94), but not other harms, e.g., blackouts (aOR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.27). CONCLUSION: While not being focused on alcohol per se, Campus Watch reduced alcohol consumption and some related harms. Such programs may be useful in similar environments where controls on alcohol availability and promotion cannot be affected and where informal controls are weak.
Authors: Margaret A Handley; Courtney R Lyles; Charles McCulloch; Adithya Cattamanchi Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Charlene M Rapsey; J Elisabeth Wells; Ms Chrianna Bharat; Meyer Glantz; Ronald C Kessler; Kate M Scott Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Monica Lamberti; Francesco Napolitano; Paola Napolitano; Antonio Arnese; Vincenzo Crispino; Gianclaudio Panariello; Gabriella Di Giuseppe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240