Literature DB >> 25107864

How to critically appraise the clinical literature.

Paul Cronin1, James V Rawson2, Marta E Heilbrun3, Janie M Lee4, Aine M Kelly5, Pina C Sanelli6, Brian W Bresnahan4, Angelisa M Paladin4.   

Abstract

Recent efforts have been made to standardize the critical appraisal of clinical health care research. In this article, critical appraisal of diagnostic test accuracy studies, screening studies, therapeutic studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cost-effectiveness studies, recommendations and/or guidelines, and medical education studies is discussed as are the available instruments to appraise the literature. By having standard appraisal instruments, these studies can be appraised more easily for completeness, bias, and applicability for implementation. Appraisal requires a different set of instruments, each designed for the individual type of research. We also hope that this article can be used in academic programs to educate the faculty and trainees of the available resources to improve critical appraisal of health research.
Copyright © 2014 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Appraisal; cost-effectiveness assessments; diagnostic test accuracy; guidelines; medical education; recommendations; screening; systematic review and meta-analysis; therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25107864     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  2 in total

1.  Cancer-related fatigue: appraising evidence-based guidelines for screening, assessment and management.

Authors:  Elizabeth J M Pearson; Meg E Morris; Carol E McKinstry
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Teaching Critical Thinking in Graduate Medical Education: Lessons Learned in Diagnostic Radiology.

Authors:  Benjamin Morrissey; Marta E Heilbrun
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2017-03-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.