Literature DB >> 25107621

Factor analysis with EM algorithm never gives improper solutions when sample covariance and initial parameter matrices are proper.

Kohei Adachi1.   

Abstract

Rubin and Thayer (Psychometrika, 47:69-76, 1982) proposed the EM algorithm for exploratory and confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. In this paper, we prove the following fact: the EM algorithm always gives a proper solution with positive unique variances and factor correlations with absolute values that do not exceed one, when the covariance matrix to be analyzed and the initial matrices including unique variances and inter-factor correlations are positive definite. We further numerically demonstrate that the EM algorithm yields proper solutions for the data which lead the prevailing gradient algorithms for factor analysis to produce improper solutions. The numerical studies also show that, in real computations with limited numerical precision, Rubin and Thayer's (Psychometrika, 47:69-76, 1982) original formulas for confirmatory factor analysis can make factor correlation matrices asymmetric, so that the EM algorithm fails to converge. However, this problem can be overcome by using an EM algorithm in which the original formulas are replaced by those guaranteeing the symmetry of factor correlation matrices, or by formulas used to prove the above fact.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 25107621     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-012-9299-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  2 in total

1.  A Procedure for Obtaining Initial Values of Parameters in the RAM Model.

Authors:  R P McDonald; W M Hartmann
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Constrained versus unconstrained estimation in structural equation modeling.

Authors:  Victoria Savalei; Stanislav Kolenikov
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2008-06
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Factor analysis models via I-divergence optimization.

Authors:  Lorenzo Finesso; Peter Spreij
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Factor Analysis Procedures Revisited from the Comprehensive Model with Unique Factors Decomposed into Specific Factors and Errors.

Authors:  Kohei Adachi
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.290

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.