Literature DB >> 25107405

On the importance of electrostatic interactions between cell penetrating peptides and membranes: a pathway toward tumor cell selectivity?

Marie-Lise Jobin1, Isabel D Alves2.   

Abstract

Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are small molecules of major interest due to their ability to efficiently transport cargos across cell membranes in a receptor- and energy-independent way and without being cytotoxic to cells. Since their discovery 20 years ago their potential interest in drug delivery and diagnosis became undeniable. CPPs are being used to deliver inside cells a large variety of cargos such as proteins, DNA, antibodies, imaging agents and nanoparticle drug carriers. Their cellular uptake mechanisms are still debated and may vary depending on their structure, nature and size of cargo they transport and type of cell line targeted. CPPs are generally rich in positively charged residues, thus they are prone to establish electrostatic interactions with anionic membrane components (sugars and lipids). Understanding the molecular basis of CPP membrane interaction and cellular uptake is crucial to improve their in vivo efficiency target-specificity. A great number of studies demonstrated the high potential of CPPs to translocate efficiently therapeutic cargos into cells and some peptides are even in clinical phase studies. Although these molecules seem perfect for a therapeutic or diagnosis purpose, they still possess a small but non negligible drawback: a complete lack of cell type specificity. Tumor cells have recently been shown to over-express certain glycosaminoglycans at the cell membrane surface and to possess a higher amount of anionic lipids in their outer leaflet than healthy cells. Such molecules confer the cell membrane an enhanced anionic character, property that could be used by CPPs to selectively target these cells. Moreover previous studies demonstrate the importance of electrostatic interactions between basic residues in the peptide, especially Arg, and the lipid headgroups and glycosaminoglycans in the cell membrane. Electrostatic interactions put at stake in this process might be one of the keys to resolve the puzzle of CPP cell type specificity.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell penetrating peptides; Electrostatic interactions; Peptide/lipid interactions; Tumor cell specificity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25107405     DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2014.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochimie        ISSN: 0300-9084            Impact factor:   4.079


  19 in total

1.  Structural Elucidation of the Cell-Penetrating Penetratin Peptide in Model Membranes at the Atomic Level: Probing Hydrophobic Interactions in the Blood-Brain Barrier.

Authors:  Swapna Bera; Rajiv K Kar; Susanta Mondal; Kalipada Pahan; Anirban Bhunia
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Cell-penetrating peptides improve pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Izabela Rusiecka; Iwona Gągało; Ivan Kocić
Journal:  Tissue Barriers       Date:  2021-08-17

Review 3.  Leveraging Electrostatic Interactions for Drug Delivery to the Joint.

Authors:  Shreedevi Kumar; Blanka Sharma
Journal:  Bioelectricity       Date:  2020-06-17

Review 4.  Methods of Liposomes Preparation: Formation and Control Factors of Versatile Nanocarriers for Biomedical and Nanomedicine Application.

Authors:  Domenico Lombardo; Mikhail A Kiselev
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 6.321

5.  Characterization of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide with Potential Anticancer Activity.

Authors:  Anja Gronewold; Mareike Horn; Ivan Ranđelović; József Tóvári; Sergio Muñoz Vázquez; Klaus Schomäcker; Ines Neundorf
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 6.  Anticancer peptide: Physicochemical property, functional aspect and trend in clinical application (Review).

Authors:  Wararat Chiangjong; Somchai Chutipongtanate; Suradej Hongeng
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Enhanced Cellular Uptake in an Electrostatically Interacting Fucoidan-L-Arginine Fiber Complex.

Authors:  Vinothini Arunagiri; Hsieh-Chih Tsai; Haile Fentahun Darge; Endiries Yibru Hanurry; Chang Yi Lee; Juin-Yih Lai; Szu-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Design strategy of surface decoration for efficient delivery of nanoparticles by computer simulation.

Authors:  Hong-Ming Ding; Yu-Qiang Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Nuclear-targeting TAT-PEG-Asp8-doxorubicin polymeric nanoassembly to overcome drug-resistant colon cancer.

Authors:  Zhen-Zhen Pan; Hui-Yuan Wang; Meng Zhang; Ting-Ting Lin; Wen-Yuan Zhang; Peng-Fei Zhao; Yi-Si Tang; Yong Xiong; Yuan-Er Zeng; Yong-Zhuo Huang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Cell Penetrating Capacity and Internalization Mechanisms Used by the Synthetic Peptide CIGB-552 and Its Relationship with Tumor Cell Line Sensitivity.

Authors:  Soledad Astrada; Julio Raúl Fernández Massó; Maribel G Vallespí; Mariela Bollati-Fogolín
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.