Literature DB >> 25106904

Time to have a paradigm shift in health care quality measurement.

Kuan-Yu Hung1, Jih-Shuin Jerng2.   

Abstract

Quality measurement is important to stakeholders in providing valid information for improvement, and has been associated with hospital accreditation in most countries. The commonly used categories of indicators are structure, process, and outcome. Outcome indicators are of foremost importance as they reflect the effect of health care; structure indicators are commonly used for assessing capacities or facilities available for providing services, whereas process indicators assess how well the service is delivered, and provide essential and important information for quality improvement. For a process indicator to be valid, it should be linked to an outcome, whereas a structure indicator must be linked to a better outcome. Although there are no strict rules for usage or selection of indicators, it is important to ensure adequate coverage of relevant domains of the health care services intended to be evaluated. Because the trends in health care services and management are changing, it is time to have a paradigm shift in health care quality measurement. Although evaluating the quality had also been extended to include quality of life and patient satisfaction, the ultimate aim of health care services should be "staying healthy, getting healthy, and living healthy". It is important for physicians to learn how to use these clinical indicators for improving service performance and organizational growth.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care; indicator; outcome; process; quality improvement; quality measurement; structure

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25106904     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc        ISSN: 0929-6646            Impact factor:   3.282


  4 in total

1.  What questionnaires to use when measuring quality of life in sacral tumor patients: the updated sacral tumor survey.

Authors:  Olivier D R van Wulfften Palthe; Stein J Janssen; Jay S Wunder; Peter C Ferguson; Guo Wei; Peter S Rose; Micheal J Yaszemski; Franklin H Sim; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey; Francis J Hornicek; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Can Hospital Competition Really Affect Hospital Behavior or Not? An Empirical Study of Different Competition Measures Comparison in Taiwan.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsien Yu; Yu-Chi Tung; Chung-Jen Wei
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Patient's perspective on improving the quality of acute medical care: determining patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Marjolein N T Kremers; Tessel Zaalberg; Eva S van den Ende; Marlou van Beneden; Frits Holleman; Prabath W B Nanayakkara; Harm R Haak
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-09-29

4.  Pedagogical value of a hospitality awards programme.

Authors:  Gérard Reach; Sophie Bentégeat; Isabelle Mounier-Emeury; Brigitte Le Cossec; Sadiyé Yesilmen; Vincent Hirsch; Yohann de Oliveira Granja; Audrey Minetti
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2019-09-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.