Literature DB >> 25106828

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of a progestin- and estrogen-releasing ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer contraceptive vaginal ring.

Brian Trung Nguyen1, Jeffrey T Jensen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multiple studies confirm the safety and efficacy of the combined ethinyl estradiol (EE) and etonogestrel contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing®). Advantages of continuous drug delivery through the vagina compared to oral administration include stable levels of contraceptive steroids without the need for daily drug administration. Although the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (CCVR) avoids the problem of missed pills, clinical data do not support greater efficacy. Vaginal administration avoids first-pass hepatic effects; however, EE is a potent inducer of hepatic globulins regardless of the route of administration. Consequently, thromboembolic risk during CCVR use is similar to that with combined oral contraceptives. Some epidemiologic and database studies suggest that the risk of thromboembolism is increased among users of the CCVR compared to levonorgestrel-containing combined pills. AREAS COVERED: This review examined the available literature for level 1 and level 2 evidence of the CCVR and its associated efficacy and safety. Studies are presented in table format with significant findings and conclusions described. EXPERT OPINION: A prospective study with 33,235 woman-years of exposure and with greater ability to control for covariates did not demonstrate an elevation of risk. The safety profile of the CCVR appears to be the same as with other combined hormonal contraceptives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  combined contraceptive vaginal ring; contraception; contraceptive failure; deep vein thrombosis; safety; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25106828     DOI: 10.1517/14740338.2014.948842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf        ISSN: 1474-0338            Impact factor:   4.250


  6 in total

1.  Retinal vein occlusion associated with combined hormonal contraceptive vaginal ring use.

Authors:  Albert S Li; Jonathan Naysan; Ronni M Lieberman
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a novel progesterone intravaginal ring in sheep.

Authors:  Herman Weiss; Bridget Martell; Ginger D Constantine; Sarah M Davis; Justin D Vidal; Philip R Mayer; Martin Doorbar; David R Friend
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  Impact of the menstrual cycle and ethinyl estradiol/etonogestrel contraceptive vaginal ring on granulysin and other mucosal immune mediators.

Authors:  Sean M Hughes; Urvashi Pandey; Christine Johnston; Jeanne Marrazzo; Florian Hladik; Elizabeth Micks
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.777

4.  Porphyria cutanea tarda associated with HFE C282Y homozygosity, iron overload, and use of a contraceptive vaginal ring.

Authors:  James C Barton; Corwin Q Edwards
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2016-02-17

5.  Pulmonary Embolism Masquerading as High Altitude Pulmonary Edema at High Altitude.

Authors:  Prativa Pandey; Benu Lohani; Holly Murphy
Journal:  High Alt Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.981

Review 6.  Recent progress in advanced biomaterials for long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Mingzhe Yan; Yanming Zhang; Zhihang Wu; Yifei Li; Keke Dou; Banghui Wang; Yingruo Wang; Qihui Zhou
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 10.435

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.