PURPOSE: This study explored the impact of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) at different treatment phases and evaluated the validity of published DTC utilities and generic health utility measures (EQ-5D and SF-6D) for economic evaluation of treatments for radio-iodine (RAI) refractory DTC. METHODS: Focus groups and interviews were conducted with DTC patients grouped by treatment phase. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on interview/focus group transcripts. A thematic coding framework was developed to compare experiences between treatment phases and inform development of a conceptual model. Model concepts were mapped to EQ-5D and SF-6D domains/items. RESULTS: Eight focus groups and 11 individual interviews were conducted with 52 DTC patients. Fifty symptoms and HRQL concepts were identified. The impact of DTC and DTC treatment on emotional and cognitive functioning was reported across the treatment phases. The impact on daily activities, mobility, and energy levels was greatest for patients with recurring/persistent or RAI-refractory DTC. Of the 50 concepts, 25 and 27 mapped directly onto domains/items in the EQ-5D and SF-6D, respectively. The SF-6D covered a broader range of DTC impact on emotional/physical problems and daily/social activities than did the EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual model summarizes the wide-ranging impact of DTC and its treatment on patients' HRQL, particularly for those with recurring/persistent or RAI-refractory DTC. Findings suggest that published DTC utilities lack validity for RAI-refractory DTC and that the SF-6D may be more sensitive to HRQL impact of DTC than the EQ-5D.
PURPOSE: This study explored the impact of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) at different treatment phases and evaluated the validity of published DTC utilities and generic health utility measures (EQ-5D and SF-6D) for economic evaluation of treatments for radio-iodine (RAI) refractory DTC. METHODS: Focus groups and interviews were conducted with DTC patients grouped by treatment phase. Qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on interview/focus group transcripts. A thematic coding framework was developed to compare experiences between treatment phases and inform development of a conceptual model. Model concepts were mapped to EQ-5D and SF-6D domains/items. RESULTS: Eight focus groups and 11 individual interviews were conducted with 52 DTC patients. Fifty symptoms and HRQL concepts were identified. The impact of DTC and DTC treatment on emotional and cognitive functioning was reported across the treatment phases. The impact on daily activities, mobility, and energy levels was greatest for patients with recurring/persistent or RAI-refractory DTC. Of the 50 concepts, 25 and 27 mapped directly onto domains/items in the EQ-5D and SF-6D, respectively. The SF-6D covered a broader range of DTC impact on emotional/physical problems and daily/social activities than did the EQ-5D. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual model summarizes the wide-ranging impact of DTC and its treatment on patients' HRQL, particularly for those with recurring/persistent or RAI-refractory DTC. Findings suggest that published DTC utilities lack validity for RAI-refractory DTC and that the SF-6D may be more sensitive to HRQL impact of DTC than the EQ-5D.
Authors: Richard Crevenna; Georg Zettinig; Mohammad Keilani; Martin Posch; Manuela Schmidinger; Christian Pirich; Martin Nuhr; Michael Wolzt; Michael Quittan; Veronika Fialka-Moser; Robert Dudczak Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2003-06-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Susan C Pitt; Elizabeth Wendt; Megan C Saucke; Corrine I Voils; Jason Orne; Cameron L Macdonald; Nadine P Connor; Rebecca S Sippel Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Tania Jaber; Steven G Waguespack; Maria E Cabanillas; Mohamed Elbanan; Thinh Vu; Ramona Dadu; Steven I Sherman; Moran Amit; Elmer B Santos; Mark Zafereo; Naifa L Busaidy Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Eline de Heus; Vivian Engelen; Irene Dingemans; Carol Richel; Marga Schrieks; Jan Maarten van der Zwan; Marc G Besselink; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Carla M L van Herpen; Saskia F A Duijts Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: Andrew G Gianoukakis; Natalia M Flores; Corey L Pelletier; Anna Forsythe; Gregory R Wolfe; Matthew H Taylor Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2016-05-30 Impact factor: 3.989
Authors: Beth A Fordham; Cicely Kerr; Hayley M de Freitas; Andrew J Lloyd; Karissa Johnston; Corey L Pelletier; Gabriel Tremblay; Anna Forsythe; Bryan McIver; Ezra Ew Cohen Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 2.711