Literature DB >> 25106006

Axial relationship between dental implants and teeth/implants: a radiographic study.

Eli E Machtei1, Orit Oettinger-Barak, Jacob Horwitz.   

Abstract

The relationship of dental implants with neighboring teeth will affect both occlusal relationship and distribution of forces; thus, the purpose of this study was to examine implants' axial relationship with adjacent and opposing teeth/implants. Data of dental implants patients was retrieved. Panoramic X rays were digitized. Computer-based software was used to measure the angular relationship between the implants and adjacent/opposing teeth and implants. Data was further sorted by the mode of placement and implants position. 50 patients (219 implants) were included. Mean angle to adjacent tooth/implant was 178.71° ± 9.18° (range 129.7°-206°). Implants were more parallel to adjacent teeth (180.99° ± 1.06°) than to adjacent implants (176.32° ± 0.54°; P = .0001). Mean angular relationship to opposite tooth was 167.88° ± 8.92° (range 137.7°-179.8°). Implants that were placed freehand or with positional guide had similar intra-arch relationship (178.22° and 178.81°, respectively) and similar inter-arch angulations (164.46° and 167.74°). Molars had greater deviation of the angular relationship (175.54°) compared to premolars (181.62°) and incisors (180.55°, P = .0001). Implants placed in the maxilla had smaller axial deviation compared to implants in the mandible (180.41° ± 0.64 vs 177.14° ± 1.02; P = .0081). Good axial relationship may be obtained in most implants placed by an experienced clinician, even when placed freehand. The mandibular posterior region is more prone to axial deviation and as such requires special attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angulations; dental implants; freehand; guides; inclination; stents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25106006     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  4 in total

1.  Presurgical evaluation of bony implant sites using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of medical education.

Authors:  Michael Dau; Amir Edalatpour; Ralf Schulze; Bilal Al-Nawas; Abdulmonem Alshihri; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Mechanical properties of resin glass fiber-reinforced abutment in comparison to titanium abutment.

Authors:  Mirko Andreasi Bassi; Rossella Bedini; Raffella Pecci; Pietro Ioppolo; Dorina Lauritano; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 May-Jun

3.  Evaluation of symptomatic maxillary sinus pathologies using panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography-influence of professional training.

Authors:  Michael Dau; Paul Marciak; Bial Al-Nawas; Henning Staedt; Abdulmonem Alshiri; Bernhard Frerich; Peer Wolfgang Kämmerer
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-04-05

4.  Risks of angled implant placement on posterior mandible buccal/lingual plated perforation: A virtual immediate implant placement study using CBCT.

Authors:  Tian-You Wang; Po-Jan Kuo; Earl Fu; Hsin-Yu Kuo; Nancy Nie-Shiuh Chang; Min-Wen Fu; E-Chin Shen; Hsien-Chung Chiu
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.080

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.