Literature DB >> 25105850

Comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure device with invasive measurements in cardiovascular postsurgical intensive care patients: a prospective observational study.

Christoph Ilies1, Genadi Grudev, Jürgen Hedderich, Jochen Renner, Markus Steinfath, Berthold Bein, Nils Haake, Robert Hanss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arterial pressure monitoring using the a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP) device during general anaesthesia is known to be interchangeable with continuous invasive arterial pressure (CIAP) monitoring. Agreement with invasive measurements in cardiovascular postsurgical intensive care patients has not been assessed.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the agreement and interchangeability of CNAP with CIAP in cardiovascular postsurgical patients and to determine the effects of cardiac arrhythmia, catecholamine dosage, respiratory weaning and calibration intervals on agreement.
DESIGN: A prospective observational study.
SETTING: German university hospital cardiovascular ICU. Data were collected from April 2010 to December 2011. PATIENTS: From 110 enrolled patients, 104 were included. Inclusion criteria were American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status III or IV patients undergoing controlled ventilation. Exclusion criteria included emergencies, complete heart block and marked arterial pressure differences greater than 10 mmHg in the two arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bland-Altman plots, bias, precision, 95% limits of agreement, percentage error and agreement : tolerability indexes (ATIs) were estimated to determine clinical agreement.
RESULTS: From 11 222 arterial pressure readings, biases (SD) for CIAP-CNAP for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) for all patients were 4.3 (11.6), -9.4 (8) and -6 (7.6) mmHg, respectively. Cardiac arrhythmia (4.1 (13.1), -14.4 (8.3), -9.5 (8.9) mmHg) and long interval to last calibration [4.5 (15), -9.8 (9.5), -6.4 (9.1) mmHg] impaired the accuracy of CNAP with failed interchangeability criteria defined by the percentage error. In contrast, use of catecholamines (epinephrine or norepinephrine infusions >0.1 μg kg min), short calibration intervals and weaning conditions did not affect accuracy, interchangeability and agreement, especially of MAP. Agreement was defined as acceptable for MAP for all data and subgroups (ATI 0.8 to 1.0) and at worst, marginal for SAP and DAP (ATI 0.9 to 1.6).
CONCLUSION: CNAP showed acceptable agreement defined by the ATI with invasive measurements for MAP and partially for DAP, but there was considerable variability for SAP. MAP should be preferred for clinical decision making. Cardiac arrhythmia, in contrast to catecholamine dosage or weaning procedures, impaired the accuracy, agreement and interchangeability of CNAP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT01003665.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25105850     DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy: Concepts, indications and risks].

Authors:  S A Haas; B Saugel; C J Trepte; D A Reuter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation From Electrocardiogram and Photoplethysmogram During Arrhythmias.

Authors:  ZengDing Liu; Bin Zhou; Ye Li; Min Tang; Fen Miao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Different Norepinephrine Regimens for Prevention of Spinal Hypotension in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Daili Chen; Xiaofei Qi; Xiaolei Huang; Yang Xu; Feilong Qiu; Yuting Yan; Yuantao Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Accuracy of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring using ClearSight during one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Sang-Wook Lee; Sangho Lee; Hyungtae Kim; Yun-Jong Kim; Mihyeon Kim; Jeong-Hyun Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Feasibility of Blood Pressure Measurement With a Wearable (Watch-Type) Monitor During Impending Syncopal Episodes.

Authors:  Antonella Groppelli; Martina Rafanelli; Giuseppe Dario Testa; Samuele Agusto; Giulia Rivasi; Andrea Ungar; Erika Carbone; Davide Soranna; Antonella Zambon; Michele Brignole; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 6.  Improving Perioperative Outcomes Through Minimally Invasive and Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring Techniques.

Authors:  Takashige Yamada; Susana Vacas; Yann Gricourt; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-05-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.