Literature DB >> 25105704

Surgery for unruptured arteriovenous malformations of the brain is better than conservative management for selected cases: a prospective cohort study.

David Bervini1, Michael Kerin Morgan, Elizabeth Anne Ritson, Gillian Heller.   

Abstract

Object The aim of this study was to identify patients who are likely to benefit from surgery for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ubAVMs). Methods The authors' database was interrogated for the risk and outcome of hemorrhage after referral and the outcome from surgery. Furthermore, the outcome from surgery incorporated those cases excluded from surgery because of perceived greater risk (sensitivity analysis). Finally, a comparison was made for the authors' patients between the natural history and surgery. Data were collected for 427 consecutively enrolled patients with ubAVMs in a database that included patients who were conservatively managed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed on patients observed for more than 1 day to determine the risk of hemorrhage. Variables that may influence the risk of first hemorrhage were assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier life table analyses from referral until the first occurrence of the following: hemorrhage, treatment, or last review. The outcome from surgery (leading to a new permanent neurological deficit with last review modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 1) was determined. Further sensitivity analysis was made to predict risk from surgery for the total ubAVM cohort by incorporating outcomes of surgical cases as well as cases excluded from surgery because of perceived risk, and assuming an adverse outcome for these excluded cases. Results A total of 377 patients with a ubAVM were included in the analysis of the risk of hemorrhage. The 5-year risk of hemorrhage for ubAVM was 11.5%. Hemorrhage resulted in an mRS score > 1 in 14 cases (88% [95% CI 63%-98%]). Patients with Spetzler-Ponce Class A ubAVMs treated by surgery (n = 190) had a risk from surgery of 1.6% (95% CI 0.3%-4.8%) for a permanent neurological deficit leading to an mRS score > 1 and 0.5% (95% CI < 0.1%-3.2%) for a permanent neurological deficit leading to an mRS score > 2. Patients with Spetzler-Ponce Class B ubAVMs treated by surgery (n = 107) had a risk from surgery of 14.0% (95% CI 8.6%-22.0%) for a permanent neurological deficit leading to an mRS score > 1. Sensitivity analysis of Spetzler-Ponce Class B ubAVMs, including those in patients excluded from surgery, showed that the true risk for surgically eligible patients may have been as high as 15.6% (95% CI 9.9%-23.7%) for mRS score > 1, had all patients who were perceived to have a greater risk experienced an adverse outcome. Patients with Spetzler-Ponce Class C ubAVMs treated by surgery (n = 44) had a risk from surgery of 38.6% (95% CI 25.7%-53.4%) for a permanent neurological deficit leading to an mRS score > 1. Sensitivity analysis of Class C ubAVMs, including those harbored by patients excluded from surgery, showed that the true risk for surgically eligible patients may have been as high as 60.9% (95% CI 49.2%-71.5%) for mRS score > 1, had all patients who were perceived to have a greater risk experienced an adverse outcome. Conclusions Surgical outcomes for Spetzler-Ponce Class A ubAVMs are better than those for conservative management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARUBA = A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations; AVM = arteriovenous malformation; Cox regression; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; Kaplan-Meier; RCT = randomized controlled trial; arteriovenous malformation; bAVM = brain AVM; brain; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; natural history; prospective cohort; surgery; ubAVM = unruptured brain AVM; vascular disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25105704     DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  11 in total

1.  Management of brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Sherri A Braksick; Jennifer E Fugate
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Contemporary management of brain arteriovenous malformations in mainland China: a web-based nationwide questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Xiangyu Meng; Li Ma; Yang Zhao; Ye Gu; Hengwei Jin; Dezhi Gao; Youxiang Li; Shibin Sun; Ali Liu; Yuanli Zhao; Xiaolin Chen; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2020-09-01

3.  Surgical Treatment vs Nonsurgical Treatment for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in Patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: A Retrospective Multicenter Consortium Study.

Authors:  Ali Tayebi Meybodi; Helen Kim; Jeffrey Nelson; Steven W Hetts; Timo Krings; Karel G terBrugge; Marie E Faughnan; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage volume and distribution in brain arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  Jay F Yu; Andrew D Nicholson; Jeffrey Nelson; Matthew D Alexander; Stephanie H Tse; Steven W Hetts; J Claude Hemphill; Helen Kim; Daniel L Cooke
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 5.  Recent Trends in Neuro-endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke, Cerebral Aneurysms, Carotid Stenosis, and Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Yuji Matsumaru; Eiichi Ishikawa; Tetsuya Yamamoto; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 6.  Multimodal Treatment Strategy for Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations of the Brain.

Authors:  Bikei Ryu; Tatsuya Ishikawa; Takakazu Kawamata
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  [Usefulness of Gradation Scales in the Surgical Treatment of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations].

Authors:  Federico Gallardo; Clara Martin; Leonardo Chang; Juan Francisco Diaz; Jorge Bustamante; Pablo Rubino
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-09-27

Review 8.  Updates in arteriovenous malformation management: the post-ARUBA era.

Authors:  James Feghali; Judy Huang
Journal:  Stroke Vasc Neurol       Date:  2019-09-21

Review 9.  Expert Consensus on the Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Yoko Kato; Van He Dong; Feres Chaddad; Katsumi Takizawa; Tsuyoshi Izumo; Hitoshi Fukuda; Takayuki Hara; Kenichiro Kikuta; Yasunobu Nakai; Toshiki Endo; Hiroki Kurita; Bin Xu; Vladimír Beneš; Raftopoulos Christian; Giacomo Pavesi; Mojgan Hodaie; Rajan Kumar Sharma; Harshal Agarwal; Krishna Mohan; Boon Seng Liew
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019-11-25

10.  Single-Stage Combined Embolization and Resection for Spetzler-Martin Grade III/IV/V Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Ruinan Li; Li Ma; Yang Zhao; Tengfei Yu; Hao Wang; Xun Ye; Rong Wang; Xiaolin Chen; Yuanli Zhao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.