Silvio Pflugi1,2, Sébastien Roujol1, Mehmet Akçakaya1, Keigo Kawaji1, Murilo Foppa1, Bobby Heydari3, Beth Goddu1, Kraig Kissinger1, Sophie Berg1, Warren J Manning1,4, Sebastian Kozerke2, Reza Nezafat1. 1. Department of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of accelerated cardiac MR (CMR) perfusion with radial sampling using nonlinear image reconstruction after exercise on an MR-compatible supine bike ergometer. METHODS: Eight healthy subjects were scanned on two separate days using radial and Cartesian CMR perfusion sequences in rest and exercise stress perfusion. Four different methods (standard gridding, conjugate gradient SENSE [CG-SENSE], nonlinear inversion with joint estimation of coil-sensitivity profiles [NLINV] and compressed sensing with a total variation constraint [TV]) were compared for the reconstruction of radial data. Cartesian data were reconstructed using SENSE. All images were assessed by two blinded readers in terms of image quality and diagnostic value. RESULTS: CG-SENSE and NLINV were scored more favorably than TV (in both rest and stress perfusion cases, P < 0.05) and gridding (for rest perfusion cases, P < 0.05). TV images showed patchy artifacts, which negatively influenced image quality especially in the stress perfusion images acquired with a low number of radial spokes. Although CG-SENSE and NLINV received better scores than Cartesian sampling in both rest and exercise stress perfusion cases, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of accelerated CMR perfusion using radial sampling after physical exercise using a supine bicycle ergometer in healthy subjects. For reconstruction of undersampled radial perfusion, CG-SENSE and NLINV resulted in better image quality than standard gridding or TV reconstruction. Further technical improvements and clinical assessment are needed before using this approach in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of accelerated cardiac MR (CMR) perfusion with radial sampling using nonlinear image reconstruction after exercise on an MR-compatible supine bike ergometer. METHODS: Eight healthy subjects were scanned on two separate days using radial and Cartesian CMR perfusion sequences in rest and exercise stress perfusion. Four different methods (standard gridding, conjugate gradient SENSE [CG-SENSE], nonlinear inversion with joint estimation of coil-sensitivity profiles [NLINV] and compressed sensing with a total variation constraint [TV]) were compared for the reconstruction of radial data. Cartesian data were reconstructed using SENSE. All images were assessed by two blinded readers in terms of image quality and diagnostic value. RESULTS:CG-SENSE and NLINV were scored more favorably than TV (in both rest and stress perfusion cases, P < 0.05) and gridding (for rest perfusion cases, P < 0.05). TV images showed patchy artifacts, which negatively influenced image quality especially in the stress perfusion images acquired with a low number of radial spokes. Although CG-SENSE and NLINV received better scores than Cartesian sampling in both rest and exercise stress perfusion cases, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of accelerated CMR perfusion using radial sampling after physical exercise using a supine bicycle ergometer in healthy subjects. For reconstruction of undersampled radial perfusion, CG-SENSE and NLINV resulted in better image quality than standard gridding or TV reconstruction. Further technical improvements and clinical assessment are needed before using this approach in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Authors: Rhys I Beaudry; T Jake Samuel; Jing Wang; Wesley J Tucker; Mark J Haykowsky; Michael D Nelson Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Thomas P Craven; Connie W Tsao; Andre La Gerche; Orlando P Simonetti; John P Greenwood Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Jason Kraig Mendes; Ganesh Adluru; Devavrat Likhite; Merlin J Fair; Peter D Gatehouse; Ye Tian; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ify R Mordi; Athar A Badar; R John Irving; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; J Graeme Houston; Chim C Lang Journal: Vasc Health Risk Manag Date: 2017-11-21
Authors: Adrianus J Bakermans; Jason N Bazil; Aart J Nederveen; Gustav J Strijkers; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Daniel A Beard; Jeroen A L Jeneson Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Thomas P Craven; Nicholas Jex; Pei G Chew; David M Higgins; Malenka M Bissell; Louise A E Brown; Christopher E D Saunderson; Arka Das; Amrit Chowdhary; Erica Dall'Armellina; Eylem Levelt; Peter P Swoboda; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-10-04 Impact factor: 2.357