Literature DB >> 2510523

Effect of a gatekeeper plan on health services use and charges: a randomized trial.

D P Martin1, P Diehr, K F Price, W C Richardson.   

Abstract

A randomized trial was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a health care plan which uses physicians as gatekeepers to control health services use and charges. New enrollees in United Healthcare (UHC), an independent practice association, were randomly assigned to the standard UHC plan requiring a gatekeeper, or to an alternate plan with equal benefits but without a gatekeeper. Individuals in both plans were similar in demographic characteristics, perceived health status, and other health insurance coverage. The gatekeeper plan had 6 percent lower total charges per enrollee than the plan without a gatekeeper. There were minor differences in hospital use and charges. Ambulatory charges were $21 lower per person per year in the plan with a gatekeeper (95% CI = -39.9, -2.1) and these were due to .3 fewer visits to specialists (95% CI = -0.50, -0.10). We conclude that a health plan which incorporates incentives and penalties for physicians to act as gatekeepers can reduce the cost of ambulatory services by limiting specialist visits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Northwest Healthcare; United Healthcare

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2510523      PMCID: PMC1349766          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.12.1628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  The gatekeeper concept.

Authors:  P Politser
Journal:  Bull Am Coll Surg       Date:  1986-06

2.  Are gatekeepers good for medicine?

Authors:  H T Paxton
Journal:  Med Econ       Date:  1986-12-22

3.  Studying and teaching the gatekeeper.

Authors:  N R Powe; J M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Financial incentives for physicians in HMOs. Is there a conflict of interest?

Authors:  A L Hillman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Primary care gatekeepers in HMOs.

Authors:  R F Catlin; R C Bradbury; R J Catlin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  Does the primary-care gatekeeper control the costs of health care? Lessons from the SAFECO experience.

Authors:  S H Moore; D P Martin; W C Richardson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cost containment through risk-sharing by primary-care physicians.

Authors:  S Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Variations in physician utilization patterns in a capitation payment IPA-HMO.

Authors:  G L Burkett
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The internist as gatekeeper. Preparing the general internist for a new role.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The use of medical resources by residency-trained family physicians and general internists. Is there a difference?

Authors:  D C Cherkin; R A Rosenblatt; L G Hart; R Schneeweiss; J LoGerfo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  The good (gatekeeper), the bad (gatekeeper), and the ugly (situation)

Authors:  C Laine; B J Turner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Primary care in the United States: primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-29

Review 3.  The challenge of studying the effects of managed care as managed care evolves.

Authors:  Alex D Federman; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  The effects of gatekeeping: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Marcial Velasco Garrido; Annette Zentner; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Health expenditures for privately insured adults enrolled in managed care gatekeeping vs indemnity plans.

Authors:  Susmita Pati; Steven Shea; Daniel Rabinowitz; Olveen Carrasquillo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield; Leiyu Shi; James Macinko
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  A cost analysis of the Iowa Medicaid primary care case management program.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Momany; Stephen D Flach; Forrest D Nelson; Peter C Damiano
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Economic efficiency of gate-keeping compared with fee for service plans: a Swiss example.

Authors:  Matthias Schwenkglenks; Georges Preiswerk; Roman Lehner; Fritz Weber; Thomas D Szucs
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Treating depression in staff-model versus network-model managed care organizations.

Authors:  L S Meredith; L V Rubenstein; K Rost; D E Ford; N Gordon; P Nutting; P Camp; K B Wells
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Entry into primary care and continuity: the effects of access.

Authors:  C B Forrest; B Starfield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.