| Literature DB >> 25105012 |
Xuan Yao1,2, Sarina Hou1, Duo Zhang1,2, Hongfeng Xia1,2, Yu-Cheng Wang2,3, Jingjing Jiang4, Huiyong Yin1,5, Hao Ying1,2,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thyroid hormones (THs) are potent hormones modulating liver lipid homeostasis. The perturbation of lipid homeostasis is a hallmark of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a very common liver disorder. It was reported that NAFLD patients were associated with higher incidence of hypothyroidism. However, whether abnormal thyroid function contributes to the pathogenesis of NAFLD remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Fatty acid; Glycogen; Liver; NAFLD; Thyroid hormone
Year: 2014 PMID: 25105012 PMCID: PMC4124172 DOI: 10.1186/2045-3701-4-38
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Biosci ISSN: 2045-3701 Impact factor: 7.133
Figure 1Liver weight and hepatic lipid content. (A) Liver weight to body weight ratio of control group (Ctrl), hypothyroid group (Hypo) and T3-treated group (T3) mice. n = 6 in each group. (B) Hepatic triglyceride content in Ctrl, Hypo and T3 mice. n = 6 ~ 8 in each group. (C) Oil red O staining and H&E staining of Ctrl, Hypo and T3 mice. Scale bar indicates a length of 200μm. *P < 0.05 vs. Ctrl, ‡P < 0.05 vs. Hypo.
Figure 2Hepatic ACC1 and FASN expression levels. Western blotting analysis of ACC1 and FASN in liver from control group (Ctrl), hypothyroid group (Hypo) and T3-treated group (T3).
Liver saturated fatty acid (SFA) quantification from different groups
| C14:0 | 57.9 ± 18.4 | 45.1 ± 11.3 | 25.5 ± 1.5 |
| C16:0 | 17093 ± 1256 | 13271 ± 658* | 15322 ± 720‡ |
| C18:0 | 9769 ± 861 | 7612 ± 424* | 12566 ± 1013*‡ |
| C20:0 | 284 ± 27 | 132 ± 12* | 214 ± 18*‡ |
| C22:0 | 254 ± 22 | 126 ± 10* | 374 ± 19*‡ |
| C24:0 | 164 ± 18 | 139 ± 5 | 191 ± 17‡ |
| 27623 ± 1631 | 21762 ± 937* | 28687 ± 1700‡ |
Individual fatty acid amount was measured by GC-MS and normalized to liver weight (nmol/g). Values represent the mean ± S.E. from five mice in the same group.
*P < 0.05 vs. Control group.
‡P < 0.05 vs. Hypothyroid group.
Liver unsaturated fatty acid (UFA) quantification from different groups
| C16:1n-7 | 862 ± 135 | 660 ± 84 | 647 ± 46 |
| C16:1n-9 | 191 ± 22 | 164 ± 26 | 95 ± 16* |
| C18:1n-7 | 1453 ± 156 | 1647 ± 228 | 1209 ± 117 |
| C18:1n-9 | 7754 ± 547 | 6789 ± 742 | 5687 ± 421* |
| C20:1n-9 | 282 ± 223 | 222 ± 26 | 151 ± 9* |
| C22:1n-9 | 88.1 ± 20.6 | 50.45 ± 13.1 | 34.0 ± 2.6* |
| C24:1n-9 | 144 ± 15 | 169 ± 10 | 111 ± 10‡ |
| 10774 ± 825 | 9702 ± 1076 | 7933 ± 605* | |
| C18:3n-3 | 231 ± 23 | 186 ± 21 | 207 ± 19 |
| C20:5n-3 | 1174 ± 111 | 1241 ± 79 | 2137 ± 187*‡ |
| C22:5n-3 | 653 ± 51 | 707 ± 56 | 898 ± 53*‡ |
| C22:6n-3 | 10200 ± 972 | 9479 ± 421 | 10362 ± 649 |
| 12366 ± 1105 | 11857 ± 571 | 13722 ± 887 | |
| C18:2n-6 | 13664 ± 970 | 14302 ± 853 | 13829 ± 820 |
| C18:3n-6 | 231 ± 23 | 186 ± 21 | 207 ± 19 |
| C20:2n-6 | 249 ± 23 | 268 ± 28 | 210 ± 13 |
| C20:3n-6 | 1355 ± 125 | 1807 ± 181 | 1201 ± 121‡ |
| C20:4n-6 | 5795 ± 646 | 5630 ± 396 | 6996 ± 733 |
| C22:4n-6 | 105 ± 14 | 93 ± 12 | 94 ± 11 |
| 21398 ± 1728 | 22286 ± 1385 | 22536 ± 1613 | |
| 33764 ± 2822 | 34144 ± 1952 | 36258 ± 2485 | |
| C18:1t | 29.2 ± 6.3 | 72.9 ± 17.8 | 25.8 ± 6.1 |
| 18:2n-6.9c12t | 27.7 ± 1.4 | 39.0 ± 4.8 | 34.0 ± 4.5 |
| 18:2n-6.9t12c | 27.2 ± 6.6 | 68.6 ± 16.5* | 13.2 ± 1.31*‡ |
| 84.2 ± 9.5 | 180.5 ± 30.1* | 73.0 ± 11.0‡ |
Individual fatty acid amount was measured by GC-MS and normalized to liver weight (nmol/g). Values represent the mean ± S.E. from five mice in the same group.
*P < 0.05 vs. Control group.
‡P < 0.05 vs. Hypothyroid group.
Figure 3Unsaturated fatty acid (UFA) concentration and SCD-1 expression. (A) C16:1n-7/C16:0 and C18:1n-9/C18:0 ratios were compared and used as surrogate measures of hepatic SCD-1 activity. n = 5 in each group (B) RT-PCR analysis of SCD-1 gene expression in mouse liver from control group (Ctrl), hypothyroid group (Hypo) and T3-treated group (T3). 18s amplified in parallel served as internal reference. n = 6 in each group. (C) Western blotting analysis of SCD-1 with β-Actin as an indication of equal protein loading. (D) Fatty acids were grouped according to the degree of saturation and the amount of fatty acid belonging to the same group was added up. The relative contents of each group were compared across the Ctrl, Hypo and T3. n = 5 in each group. (E) The ratios between n-6 PUFA and n-3 PUFA in different groups were compared. n = 5 in each group. *P < 0.05 vs. Ctrl, ‡P < 0.05 vs. Hypo.
Figure 4Hepatic glycogen content and the expression of gene related to glycogen synthesis. (A) Hepatic glycogen content was measured from liver samples obtained in group control group (Ctrl), hypothyroid group (Hypo) and T3-treated group (T3). n = 6 in each group. (B) PAS staining of liver section from Ctrl, Hypo and T3 indicated the presence of glycogen. (C) RT-PCR analysis of GYS2 gene expression in mouse liver from Ctrl, Hypo and T3. 18s amplified in parallel served as internal reference. n = 6 ~ 8 in each group. (D) Western blotting analysis of GYS2 with α-Tubulin as an indication of equal protein loading. *P < 0.05 vs. Ctrl, ‡P < 0.05 vs. Hypo.
Figure 5Flow charts illustrating the preferred metabolic pathways under hypothyroid status before and after T3 treatment. The hypothyroidism was compared with Control (A) while hypothyroidism + T3 status was compared with hypothyroidism (B).