Literature DB >> 25104055

Biatrial ablation versus limited right atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation associated with atrial septal defect in adults.

Zhaolei Jiang1, Nan Ma, Hang Yin, Fangbao Ding, Hao Liu, Ju Mei.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of limited right atrial ablation versus biatrial ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with atrial septal defect (ASD) in adults.
METHODS: The subjects were 47 consecutive adult patients who underwent ASD closure with limited right atrial ablation (RA, n = 19) or biatrial ablation (BA, n = 28) for AF, between January, 2007 and December, 2012. Eighteen patients had persistent AF and 29 had long-standing persistent AF. Bipolar RF ablation was performed for all patients.
RESULTS: AF ablation and ASD closure were performed successfully in all patients. The BA group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, and hospital stay than the RA group, but the incidence of major postoperative complications was not significantly different between the groups. On discharge, normal sinus rhythm was maintained in 100% of the BA group patients and 78.9% of the RA group patients (P = 0.045). By 2 years postoperatively, cumulative maintenance of normal sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic drugs was confirmed in 87.7 ± 6.7% of the BA group patients and 47.4 ± 11.5% of the RA group patients (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Biatrial ablation restored and maintained sinus rhythm more effectively than limited right atrial ablation, without increasing the risk of postoperative complications for AF associated with ASD in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25104055     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-1009-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  28 in total

1.  The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures.

Authors:  Sunil M Prasad; Hersh S Maniar; Cindy J Camillo; Richard B Schuessler; John P Boineau; Thoralf M Sundt; James L Cox; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with structural heart disease.

Authors:  Andrew E Darby; John P Dimarco
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The radiofrequency modified maze procedure. A less invasive surgical approach to atrial fibrillation during open-heart surgery.

Authors:  H T Sie; W P Beukema; A R Ramdat Misier; A Elvan; J J Ennema; H J Wellens
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation in athletes with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Pieter Koopman; Dieter Nuyens; Christophe Garweg; Andre La Gerche; Stijn De Buck; Lieve Van Casteren; Becker Alzand; Rik Willems; Hein Heidbuchel
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Right atrial separation effect for chronic atrial fibrillation with atrial septal defect: report of four cases.

Authors:  Masanori Murakami; Haruhiko Okada; Masahiko Nishida; Kimikazu Hamano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.520

6.  Combined atrial septal defect surgical closure and irrigated radiofrequency ablation in adult patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Giamberti; Massimo Chessa; Sara Foresti; Raul Abella; Gianfranco Butera; Carlo de Vincentiis; Mario Carminati; Lorenzo Menicanti; Alessandro Frigiola
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Postoperative atrial fibrillation: mechanism, prevention, and future perspective.

Authors:  Yasushige Shingu; Suguru Kubota; Satoru Wakasa; Tomonori Ooka; Tsuyoshi Tachibana; Yoshiro Matsui
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Right atrial lesions do not improve the efficacy of a complete left atrial lesion set in the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation, but they do increase procedural morbidity.

Authors:  Lori K Soni; Sophia R Cedola; Jacob Cogan; Jeffrey Jiang; Jonathan Yang; Hiroo Takayama; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Atrial arrhythmias in adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Judith Bouchardy; Judith Therrien; Louise Pilote; Raluca Ionescu-Ittu; Giuseppe Martucci; Natalie Bottega; Ariane J Marelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Reentrant and focal activations during atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial septal defect.

Authors:  Takashi Nitta; Shun-Ichiro Sakamoto; Yasuo Miyagi; Masahiro Fujii; Yosuke Ishii; Masami Ochi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  3 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes of modified-maze procedures in adults with atrial septal defect.

Authors:  Shun-Ichiro Sakamoto; Atsushi Hiromoto; Yosuke Ishii; Takashi Sasaki; Yasuo Miyagi; Takashi Nitta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Right minithoracotomy versus conventional median sternotomy for patients undergoing mitral valve surgery and Cox-maze IV ablation with entirely bipolar radiofrequency clamp.

Authors:  Zhaolei Jiang; Min Tang; Nan Ma; Hao Liu; Fangbao Ding; Chunrong Bao; Ju Mei
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Differences in atrial fibrillation‑associated proteins between the left and right atrial appendages from patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease: A comparative proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Hai Liu; Guangxian Chen; Hongsheng Zheng; Han Qin; Mengya Liang; Kangni Feng; Zhongkai Wu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 2.952

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.