Literature DB >> 25103764

Draft Genome Sequences of Clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus Strains Isolated in Maryland (2010 to 2013).

Julie Haendiges1, Ruth Timme2, Marc Allard2, Robert A Myers1, Justin Payne2, Eric W Brown2, Peter Evans2, Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona3.   

Abstract

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is the leading cause of food-borne illnesses associated with the consumption of raw shellfish worldwide. Here, we report 45 draft genomes of V. parahaemolyticus. Thirty-five of them are strains that were isolated from clinical cases in the state of Maryland from 2010 to 2013. The remaining 10 strains were historical isolates, isolated mostly from the West Coast of the United States during the period of 1988 to 2004. The availability of these genomes will allow for future phylogenetic analyses with other V. parahaemolyticus strains.
Copyright © 2014 Haendiges et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25103764      PMCID: PMC4125775          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00776-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a natural inhabitant of temperate and tropical coastal waters and is the leading cause of seafood-borne gastroenteritis in the United States (1). Cases of the illness are usually associated with eating raw or undercooked seafood. Strains of V. parahaemolyticus carrying genes for thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) and/or thermostable direct hemolysin-related hemolysin (trh) are associated pathogenic strains (2) and represent <1% of the environmental V. parahaemolyticus strains (3). During the last two decades, V. parahaemolyticus infections and outbreaks have increased in number throughout the world. Most of these new cases belong to the pandemic clonal complex 3 (CC3) (4–7). The emergence of CC3 has elevated public health concerns of the worldwide spread of V. parahaemolyticus, previously uncharacteristic of this pathogen. The existence of other V. parahaemolyticus CCs (CC36 and CC34) has been observed among the coastal United States strains (4). Although infections in the United States are typically caused by strains from the CC36 endemic to the West Coast (4, 8), an outbreak in Maryland in August 2012 (7) was caused by strains belonging to the pandemic clonal complex 3 (CC3). A total of 56 cases associated with V. parahaemolyticus were reported between 2010 and 2013 in the state of Maryland. We sequenced 35 of these V. parahaemolyticus outbreak strains isolated from those cases to better understand the potential changes in the V. parahaemolyticus populations on this coastal state (Table 1). Ten additional historical V. parahaemolyticus strains from different sources (clinical and environmental) were also sequenced (Table 1).
TABLE 1

List of the V. parahaemolyticus strains sequenced in this study and their GenBank accession no.

StrainsWGS accession no.aCFSAN no.No. of contigsSTState of isolationYr of isolationSourceb
VP1JNSM00000000CFSAN007429285631MD2012C
VP8JNSN00000000CFSAN007430298631MD2012C
VP9JNSO00000000CFSAN007431278631MD2012C
VP31JNSP00000000CFSAN007432273631MD2013C
VP35JNSQ00000000CFSAN007433319631MD2013C
VP41JNSR00000000CFSAN007434233631MD2013C
VP44JNSS00000000CFSAN007435223631MD2013C
VP45JNST00000000CFSAN007436214631MD2013C
VP2JNSU00000000CFSAN007437243651MD2012C
VP3JNSV00000000CFSAN007438212652MD2012C
VP4JNSW00000000CFSAN007439184653MD2012C
VP34JNSX00000000CFSAN007440249653MD2013C
VP5JNSY00000000CFSAN007441286113MD2012C
VP7JNSZ00000000CFSAN007442287113MD2012C
VP11JNTA00000000CFSAN007443283113MD2012C
VP6JNTB00000000CFSAN007444135677MD2012C
VP10JNTC00000000CFSAN00744520343MD2012C
VP13JNTD00000000CFSAN007446137678MD2012C
VP14JNTE00000000CFSAN007447214162MD2012C
VP15JNTF00000000CFSAN007448232679MD2012C
VP16JNTG00000000CFSAN0074491473MD2012C
VP17JNTH00000000CFSAN0074501573MD2012C
VP18JNTI00000000CFSAN0074511293MD2012C
VP19JNTJ00000000CFSAN0074523048MD2010C
VP20JNTK00000000CFSAN0074531868MD2010C
VP39JNTL00000000CFSAN007455217896MD2013C
VP12JNTM00000000CFSAN00612928436MD2012C
VP32JNTN00000000CFSAN00613128136MD2013C
VP33JNTO00000000CFSAN00613228336MD2013C
VP36JNTP00000000CFSAN00613327636MD2013C
VP38JNTQ00000000CFSAN00613421536MD2013C
VP40JNTR00000000CFSAN00613525036MD2013C
VP42JNTS00000000CFSAN00746027936MD2013C
VP43JNTT00000000CFSAN00746118536MD2013C
VP30JNTV00000000CFSAN00613026936MD2013C
029-1(b)JNTW00000000CFSAN00161112036OR1997E
48057JNTX00000000CFSAN00161211136WA1990C
K1198JNTY00000000CFSAN00161413059AK2004E
10292JNTZ00000000CFSAN00161712650WA1997C
48291JNUA00000000CFSAN00161810536WA1990C
F11-3AJNUB00000000CFSAN00161910436WA1988E
NY-3483JNUC00000000CFSAN00162012536NY1998E
K1203JNUD00000000CFSAN00117320959AK2004E
98-513-F52JNUE00000000CFSAN00116012034LA1998E
10290JNUF00000000CFSAN00161315136WA1997C

WGS- NCBI whole-genome shotgun assembly database.

C, clinical; E, environmental; ST, sequence type.

List of the V. parahaemolyticus strains sequenced in this study and their GenBank accession no. WGS- NCBI whole-genome shotgun assembly database. C, clinical; E, environmental; ST, sequence type. The genomes were sequenced using Ion Torrent, and in silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (4) showed that these isolates exhibited diverse sequence types (STs) (Table 1). DNA from each strain was isolated from overnight cultures with the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The genomes were sequenced using the Ion Torrent (PGM) sequencing system. The 36 strains from Maryland were sequenced using 300-bp read chemistry (Life Technologies), while the 10 historical strains were sequenced using 200-bp read chemistry, according to manufacturer’s instructions, at 17 to 68× coverage using the Ion PGM 200 or 300 sequencing kit, respectively, depending of the template used, according to manufacturer’s instructions. The genomic sequence contigs for each strain were de novo assembled using the CLC Genomics Workbench version 5.5.1 (CLC bio, Germantown, MD, USA). The G+C mol% of the strains was between 45.1 and 45.4%, which is similar to the reported G+C contents for other V. parahaemolyticus strains. The sequences were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Automatic Annotation Pipeline (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/Pipeline.html) (9). A detailed report of a full comparative analysis between these V. parahaemolyticus genomes will be included in a future publication. This large data release contributes to the efforts of a newly created V. parahaemolyticus BioProject (no. PRJNA245882) at the NCBI, spearheaded by the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN)-FDA and the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH) of the state of Maryland, in order to improve the detection of new strains or track the emergence of new clonal strains in geographical regions where these strains are not endemic.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The draft genome sequences of the 45 V. parahaemolyticus strains are available in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Global dissemination of Vibrio parahaemolyticus serotype O3:K6 and its serovariants.

Authors:  G Balakrish Nair; Thandavarayan Ramamurthy; Sujit K Bhattacharya; Basabjit Dutta; Yoshifumi Takeda; David A Sack
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Emergence of a restricted bioserovar of Vibrio parahaemolyticus as the predominant cause of Vibrio-associated gastroenteritis on the West Coast of the United States and Mexico.

Authors:  S L Abbott; C Powers; C A Kaysner; Y Takeda; M Ishibashi; S W Joseph; J M Janda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Environmental investigations of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters after outbreaks in Washington, Texas, and New York (1997 and 1998).

Authors:  A DePaola; C A Kaysner; J Bowers; D W Cook
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Determination of molecular phylogenetics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains by multilocus sequence typing.

Authors:  Narjol González-Escalona; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Jaime Romero; Romilio T Espejo; Lee-Ann Jaykus; Angelo DePaola
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens.

Authors:  Elaine Scallan; Robert M Hoekstra; Frederick J Angulo; Robert V Tauxe; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Sharon L Roy; Jeffery L Jones; Patricia M Griffin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6, Europe.

Authors:  Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Lourdes Simental; David Velasco; Angelo DePaola; Masanori Ishibashi; Yoshitsugu Nakaguchi; Mitsuaki Nishibuchi; Dolores Carrera-Flores; Carmen Rey-Alvarez; Anxela Pousa
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Maryland, USA, 2012.

Authors:  Julie Haendiges; Marvin Rock; Robert A Myers; Eric W Brown; Peter Evans; Narjol Gonzalez-Escalona
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.883

8.  Population structure of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus from the Pacific Northwest coast of the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Turner; Rohinee N Paranjpye; Eric D Landis; Stanley V Biryukov; Narjol González-Escalona; William B Nilsson; Mark S Strom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The National Center for Biotechnology Information's Protein Clusters Database.

Authors:  William Klimke; Richa Agarwala; Azat Badretdin; Slava Chetvernin; Stacy Ciufo; Boris Fedorov; Boris Kiryutin; Kathleen O'Neill; Wolfgang Resch; Sergei Resenchuk; Susan Schafer; Igor Tolstoy; Tatiana Tatusova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 16.971

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Patterns of Vibrio parahaemolyticus Strains from North America Inferred from Whole-Genome Sequence Data.

Authors:  John J Miller; Bart C Weimer; Ruth Timme; Catharina H M Lüdeke; James B Pettengill; DJ Darwin Bandoy; Allison M Weis; James Kaufman; B Carol Huang; Justin Payne; Errol Strain; Jessica L Jones
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Genetic characterization of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus from the Northeast USA reveals emerging resident and non-indigenous pathogen lineages.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Saba Ilyas; Jeffrey A Hall; Stephen H Jones; Vaughn S Cooper; Cheryl A Whistler
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Genomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal distinct biological functions for cold shock proteins (VpaCspA and VpaCspD) in Vibrio parahaemolyticus CHN25 during low-temperature survival.

Authors:  Chunhua Zhu; Boyi Sun; Taigang Liu; Huajun Zheng; Wenyi Gu; Wei He; Fengjiao Sun; Yaping Wang; Meicheng Yang; Weicheng Bei; Xu Peng; Qunxin She; Lu Xie; Lanming Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.