Literature DB >> 25103321

Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.

Catherine C McDonald1, Allison E Curry2, Venk Kandadai3, Marilyn S Sommers4, Flaura K Winston5.   

Abstract

Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death and acquired disability during the first four decades of life. While teen drivers have the highest crash risk, few studies examine the similarities and differences in teen and adult driver crashes. We aimed to: (1) identify and compare the most frequent crash scenarios-integrated information on a vehicle's movement prior to crash, immediate pre-crash event, and crash configuration-for teen and adult drivers involved in serious crashes, and (2) for the most frequent scenarios, explore whether the distribution of driver critical errors differed for teens and adult drivers. We analyzed data from the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey, a nationally representative study of serious crashes conducted by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration from 2005 to 2007. Our sample included 642 16- to 19-year-old and 1167 35- to 54-year-old crash-involved drivers (weighted n=296,482 and 439,356, respectively) who made a critical error that led to their crash's critical pre-crash event (i.e., event that made the crash inevitable). We estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare the relative frequency of crash scenarios and driver critical errors. The top five crash scenarios among teen drivers, accounting for 37.3% of their crashes, included: (1) going straight, other vehicle stopped, rear end; (2) stopped in traffic lane, turning left at intersection, turn into path of other vehicle; (3) negotiating curve, off right edge of road, right roadside departure; (4) going straight, off right edge of road, right roadside departure; and (5) stopped in lane, turning left at intersection, turn across path of other vehicle. The top five crash scenarios among adult drivers, accounting for 33.9% of their crashes, included the same scenarios as the teen drivers with the exception of scenario (3) and the addition of going straight, crossing over an intersection, and continuing on a straight path. For two scenarios ((1) and (3) above), teens were more likely than adults to make a critical decision error (e.g., traveling too fast for conditions). Our findings indicate that among those who make a driver critical error in a serious crash, there are few differences in the scenarios or critical driver errors for teen and adult drivers.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult drivers; Crash scenarios; Crash-contributing factors; Risk factors; Teen drivers; Traffic safety

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25103321     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  12 in total

1.  Teen Drivers' Perceptions of Inattention and Cell Phone Use While Driving.

Authors:  Catherine C McDonald; Marilyn S Sommers
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  Simulated Driving Assessment (SDA) for teen drivers: results from a validation study.

Authors:  Catherine C McDonald; Venk Kandadai; Helen Loeb; Thomas S Seacrist; Yi-Ching Lee; Zachary Winston; Flaura K Winston
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 3.  A Review of Hazard Anticipation Training Programs for Young Drivers.

Authors:  Catherine C McDonald; Arthur H Goodwin; Anuj K Pradhan; Matthew R E Romoser; Allan F Williams
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 4.  Pediatric Sports-Related Concussion: An Approach to Care.

Authors:  Olivia E Podolak; Kristy B Arbogast; Christina L Master; David Sleet; Matthew F Grady
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2021-01-21

5.  Evaluation of a Risk Awareness Perception Training Program on Novice Teen Driver Behavior at Left-Turn Intersections.

Authors:  Catherine C McDonald; Venk Kandadai; Helen Loeb; Thomas Seacrist; Yi-Ching Lee; Dana Bonfiglio; Donald L Fisher; Flaura K Winston
Journal:  Transp Res Rec       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.560

Review 6.  Executive Function Capacities, Negative Driving Behavior and Crashes in Young Drivers.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walshe; Chelsea Ward McIntosh; Daniel Romer; Flaura K Winston
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Pilot Efficacy of a DriveFocus™ Intervention on the Driving Performance of Young Drivers.

Authors:  Liliana Alvarez; Sherrilene Classen; Shabnam Medhizadah; Melissa Knott; Wenqing He
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-05-04

8.  Simulator Pre-Screening of Underprepared Drivers Prior to Licensing On-Road Examination: Clustering of Virtual Driving Test Time Series Data.

Authors:  David Grethlein; Flaura Koplin Winston; Elizabeth Walshe; Sean Tanner; Venk Kandadai; Santiago Ontañón
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  An Integrative Review of Return to Driving After Concussion in Adolescents.

Authors:  Divya Jain; Kristy B Arbogast; Christina L Master; Catherine C McDonald
Journal:  J Sch Nurs       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  A Novel Health-Transportation Partnership Paves The Road For Young Driver Safety Through Virtual Assessment.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walshe; Daniel Romer; Venkatesh Kandadai; Flaura K Winston
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.