Literature DB >> 25102957

Putting people on the map through an approach that integrates social data in conservation planning.

Sheri L Stephanson1, Michael B Mascia.   

Abstract

Conservation planning is integral to strategic and effective operations of conservation organizations. Drawing upon biological sciences, conservation planning has historically made limited use of social data. We offer an approach for integrating data on social well-being into conservation planning that captures and places into context the spatial patterns and trends in human needs and capacities. This hierarchical approach provides a nested framework for characterizing and mapping data on social well-being in 5 domains: economic well-being, health, political empowerment, education, and culture. These 5 domains each have multiple attributes; each attribute may be characterized by one or more indicators. Through existing or novel data that display spatial and temporal heterogeneity in social well-being, conservation scientists, planners, and decision makers may measure, benchmark, map, and integrate these data within conservation planning processes. Selecting indicators and integrating these data into conservation planning is an iterative, participatory process tailored to the local context and planning goals. Social well-being data complement biophysical and threat-oriented social data within conservation planning processes to inform decisions regarding where and how to conserve biodiversity, provide a structure for exploring socioecological relationships, and to foster adaptive management. Building upon existing conservation planning methods and insights from multiple disciplines, this approach to putting people on the map can readily merge with current planning practices to facilitate more rigorous decision making.
© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bienestar social; conservación por eco-región; conservation planning; ecoregion conservation; fortalecimiento político; indicadores sociales; planeación de la conservación; political empowerment; social indicators; social well-being

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25102957     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  6 in total

Review 1.  Connectivity and complex systems: learning from a multi-disciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Laura Turnbull; Marc-Thorsten Hütt; Andreas A Ioannides; Stuart Kininmonth; Ronald Poeppl; Klement Tockner; Louise J Bracken; Saskia Keesstra; Lichan Liu; Rens Masselink; Anthony J Parsons
Journal:  Appl Netw Sci       Date:  2018-06-18

2.  Land-use and land-cover change shape the sustainability and impacts of protected areas.

Authors:  Anteneh T Tesfaw; Alexander Pfaff; Rachel E Golden Kroner; Siyu Qin; Rodrigo Medeiros; Michael B Mascia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Guiding principles for evaluating the impacts of conservation interventions on human well-being.

Authors:  Emily Woodhouse; Katherine M Homewood; Emilie Beauchamp; Tom Clements; J Terrence McCabe; David Wilkie; E J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits.

Authors:  Gust M Annis; Douglas R Pearsall; Katherine J Kahl; Erika L Washburn; Christopher A May; Rachael Franks Taylor; James B Cole; David N Ewert; Edward T Game; Patrick J Doran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Addressing distribution equity in spatial conservation prioritization for small-scale fisheries.

Authors:  Alessia Kockel; Natalie C Ban; Maycira Costa; Philip Dearden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reconsidering priorities for forest conservation when considering the threats of mining and armed conflict.

Authors:  Brooke A Williams; Hedley S Grantham; James E M Watson; Aurélie C Shapiro; Andrew J Plumptre; Samuel Ayebare; Elizabeth Goldman; Ayesha I T Tulloch
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 6.943

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.