Raquel M Huarte1, John T Roland. 1. aDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain bDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Cochlear Implant Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the recent medical literature related to the feasibility of hearing preservation after cochlear implantation and to identify variables that may influence hearing preservation in the implanted ear as well as the hearing perception outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: The published data provide evidence that hearing preservation in the implanted ear yields significantly higher levels of speech recognition in complex listening environments than having just monaural acoustic hearing. There is ample evidence that hearing preservation is feasible and the reported rate is 50-89% in the low frequencies. This rate tends to be stable over time, except for a small percentage that diminishes around 3 months of follow-up. However, factors or variables which influence hearing preservation are yet unknown. Variables such as patient age, degree of residual hearing, insertion depth, insertion speed, duration of profound high frequency deafness and electrode design have been proposed. SUMMARY: Much attention has been focused on hearing preservation in the implanted ear. Thus, investigations into electrode array design, surgical technique and pharmacological management have been undertaken. Minimizing damage in the inner ear not only enhances the possibility for hearing preservation and better performance in complex listening scenarios but also conserves inner ear structures for future treatments.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the recent medical literature related to the feasibility of hearing preservation after cochlear implantation and to identify variables that may influence hearing preservation in the implanted ear as well as the hearing perception outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: The published data provide evidence that hearing preservation in the implanted ear yields significantly higher levels of speech recognition in complex listening environments than having just monaural acoustic hearing. There is ample evidence that hearing preservation is feasible and the reported rate is 50-89% in the low frequencies. This rate tends to be stable over time, except for a small percentage that diminishes around 3 months of follow-up. However, factors or variables which influence hearing preservation are yet unknown. Variables such as patient age, degree of residual hearing, insertion depth, insertion speed, duration of profound high frequency deafness and electrode design have been proposed. SUMMARY: Much attention has been focused on hearing preservation in the implanted ear. Thus, investigations into electrode array design, surgical technique and pharmacological management have been undertaken. Minimizing damage in the inner ear not only enhances the possibility for hearing preservation and better performance in complex listening scenarios but also conserves inner ear structures for future treatments.
Authors: Alicia M Quesnel; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; John J Rosowski; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Joseph B Nadol Journal: Hear Res Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Juan Ansó; Cilgia Dür; Mareike Apelt; Frederic Venail; Olivier Scheidegger; Kathleen Seidel; Helene Rohrbach; Franck Forterre; Matthias S Dettmer; Inti Zlobec; Klaus Weber; Marco Matulic; Masoud Zoka-Assadi; Markus Huth; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber Journal: Front Surg Date: 2019-10-01
Authors: Andreas Buechner; Michael Bardt; Sabine Haumann; Gunnar Geissler; Rolf Salcher; Thomas Lenarz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: S Weber; K Gavaghan; W Wimmer; T Williamson; N Gerber; J Anso; B Bell; A Feldmann; C Rathgeb; M Matulic; M Stebinger; D Schneider; G Mantokoudis; O Scheidegger; F Wagner; M Kompis; M Caversaccio Journal: Sci Robot Date: 2017-03-15
Authors: A Perenyi; F Toth; B Dimak; R Nagy; P Schoerg; J Jori; J G Kiss; G Sprinzl; M Csanady; L Rovo Journal: J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2019-09-06