Literature DB >> 25101741

The slippery slope of cisgenesis.

Dennis Eriksson1, Sten Stymne2, Jan K Schjoerring1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25101741     DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Do cisgenic plants warrant less stringent oversight?

Authors:  Henk J Schouten; Frans A Krens; Evert Jacobsen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants: international regulations for genetically modified organisms should be altered to exempt cisgenesis.

Authors:  Henk J Schouten; Frans A Krens; Evert Jacobsen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 3.  Cisgenesis strongly improves introgression breeding and induced translocation breeding of plants.

Authors:  Evert Jacobsen; Henk J Schouten
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Contrary to popular belief.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Intragenesis and cisgenesis as alternatives to transgenic crop development.

Authors:  Inger Bæksted Holme; Toni Wendt; Preben Bach Holm
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 9.803

6.  The role of scientific knowledge in shaping public attitudes to GM technologies.

Authors:  Henrik Mielby; Peter Sandøe; Jesper Lassen
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2012-01-23

Review 7.  Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics.

Authors:  Koreen Ramessar; Ariadna Peremarti; Sonia Gómez-Galera; Shaista Naqvi; Marian Moralejo; Pilar Muñoz; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.145

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina.

Authors:  Agustina I Whelan; Martin A Lema
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.074

2.  Reply to Cisgenesis as a golden mean.

Authors:  Henk Schouten
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Revisiting GMOs: Are There Differences in European Consumers' Acceptance and Valuation for Cisgenically vs Transgenically Bred Rice?

Authors:  Anne-Cécile Delwaide; Lawton L Nalley; Bruce L Dixon; Diana M Danforth; Rodolfo M Nayga; Ellen J Van Loo; Wim Verbeke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Recovering the Original Intentions of Risk Assessment and Management of Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union.

Authors:  Dennis Eriksson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.