| Literature DB >> 25101661 |
Lynn Meurs1, Moustapha Mbow2, Nele Boon3, Kim Vereecken1, Abena Serwaa Amoah4, Lucja A Labuda5, Tandakha Ndiaye Dièye6, Souleymane Mboup6, Maria Yazdanbakhsh7, Katja Polman1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Africa, many areas are co-endemic for the two major Schistosoma species, S. mansoni and S. haematobium. Epidemiological studies have suggested that host immunological factors may play an important role in co-endemic areas. As yet, little is known about differences in host immune responses and possible immunological interactions between S. mansoni and S. haematobium in humans. The aim of this study was to analyze host cytokine responses to antigens from either species in a population from a co-endemic focus, and relate these to S. mansoni and S. haematobium infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25101661 PMCID: PMC4125161 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Schistosoma infections in the study population.
|
|
| Prevalence (n) | Code for Infection Status In | |||
| Subjects | Feces | Urine | Feces | Urine | ||
|
|
| |||||
| Single infections | 63 | |||||
| + | − | − | − | 42 | M (dark blue) | |
| − | − | − | + | 21 | H (light blue) | |
| Mixed infections | 95 | MH | ||||
| + | − | − | + | 81 | MH (pink) | |
| + | + | − | + | 13 | MH (yellow) | |
| − | + | − | + | 1 | MH (red) | |
|
| − | − | − | − |
| N (green) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Schistosoma mansoni eggs that were ectopically excreted in the urine had a S. mansoni-like morphology but may have had a genetically hybrid constitution [4], [6].
Distribution of Schistosoma infection in the study population.
| n |
|
| |||
| Percentage of positives |
| Percentage of positives |
| ||
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | |||
| 5–9 | 51 | 58.8 | 66.7 | ||
| 10–19 | 59 | 88.1 | 72.9 | ||
| 20–39 | 55 | 58.2 | 49.1 | ||
| ≥40 | 35 | 65.7 | 34.3 | ||
|
| 0.32 | 0.20 | |||
| Male | 88 | 72.7 | 63.6 | ||
| Female | 112 | 65.2 | 53.6 | ||
Figure 1Variation in Schistosoma antigen-induced cytokine responses in relation to Schistosoma infection intensity.
Each three-dimensional (3D) nMDS ordination is represented in two 2D planes (Supporting Information S1). Left and right panels represent the 1st and 2nd, and 2nd and 3rd dimensions, respectively. Panels A and B show the S. mansoni egg antigen (SEAm)-induced cytokine profile, Panels C and D that of S. haematobium SEA(h), Panels E and F that of S. mansoni adult worm antigens (AWAm), and Panels G and H show S. haematobium AWA(h)-induced cytokine profiles. Green dots represent individuals. Distances between dots approximate the rank order of dissimilarities in cytokine profiles between the respective individuals with stress values (i.e. discrepancies) of 0.051 for SEAm, 0.041 for SEAh, 0.058 for AWAm, and 0.061 for AWAh. Red arrows indicate linear gradients of normalized net cytokine responses on which the nMDS is based. Green dot sizes are proportional to individual values of normalized infection intensity of S. mansoni (for simplicity dots were only labelled with S. mansoni (not S. haematobium) infection intensity). Black arrows indicate linear gradients of post hoc fitted normalized infection intensity of S. mansoni (‘Sm’) and S. haematobium (‘Sh’). The length of the arrows is proportional to the goodness of fit onto the cytokine profile within one 2D plane, but lengths cannot be compared between cytokine and infection intensity arrows. Arrows are only depicted if their fit was significant at the level of p = 0.05 in 3D ordinations (see Table 4), as well as in the respective 2D planes. In Panel H, the arrows of IL-5 response and S. mansoni infection intensity are overlapping and their labels are therefore illegible. aThe biological a posteriori interpretation of nMDS1 (left x-axis) and nMDS2 (y-axis) were added between brackets on the axis labels, but nMDS3 (right x-axis) could not be interpreted.
Figure 2Variation in Schistosoma antigen-induced cytokine responses in relation to Schistosoma infection status.
Each three-dimensional (3D) nMDS ordination is represented in two 2D planes (Supporting Information S1) as in Figure 1: Left and right panels represent the 1st and 2nd, and 2nd and 3rd dimensions, respectively. Panels A and B show the S. mansoni egg antigen (SEAm)-induced cytokine profile, Panels C and D that of S. haematobium SEA(h), Panels E and F that of S. mansoni adult worm antigens (AWAm), and Panels G and H show S. haematobium AWA(h)-induced cytokine profiles. Dots represent individuals and distances between dots approximate the rank order of dissimilarities in cytokine profiles between the respective individuals with stress values (i.e. discrepancies) of 0.051 for SEAm, 0.041 for SEAh, 0.058 for AWAm, and 0.061 for AWAh. Red arrows indicate linear gradients of normalized net cytokine responses on which the nMDS is based. The length of the arrows is proportional to the goodness of fit onto the cytokine profile within one 2D plane, and arrows are only depicted if their fit was significant at the level of p = 0.05 in 3D ordinations (see Table 4), as well as in the respective 2D planes. Green dots represent uninfected individuals, dark blue those with single S. mansoni infections, light blue single S. haematobium, and the other colors indicate people with mixed infections: pink indicates mixed infections without ectopic egg elimination, yellow mixed infections with S. mansoni in feces as well as in urine and S. haematobium in urine, and red dots represent one individual with both S. mansoni and S. haematobium eggs in urine (possibly a hybrid species [4]–[6]; see also Table 1). Ellipsoids represent 95% confidence intervals for average group scores, for different infection statuses: uninfected (‘N’), single S. mansoni (‘M’), single S. haematobium (‘H’), versus mixed infection (‘MH’). Ellipsoids are drawn using the function ‘ordiellipse’, and only depicted if the fit of infection status onto the cytokine profile was significant at the level of p = 0.05 in 3D ordinations (see Table 4), as well as in the respective 2D planes. In Panel A and G, the labels for single S. mansoni (‘M’) and mixed infection (‘MH’) are overlapping. aThe biological a posteriori interpretation of nMDS1 (left x-axis) and nMDS2 (y-axis) were added between brackets on the axis labels, but nMDS3 (right x-axis) could not be interpreted.
Association between Schistosoma infection and Schistosoma antigen-induced cytokine profiles.
| Infection | Antigen-induced cytokine profile | |||
| SEAm | SEAh | AWAm | AWAh | |
|
| ||||
| R2 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| R2 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| R2 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
|
|
|
| 0.2 |
|
Figure 1 shows the fit of infection intensity and Figure 2 that of infection status (uninfected, single S. mansoni, single S. haematobium, versus mixed infections) onto each of the four Schistosoma antigen-induced cytokine profiles (either SEAm, SEAh, AWAm or AWAh), obtained by the ‘metaMDS’ and ‘envfit’ functions (see also Supporting Information S1) [12], [13]. Here, the goodness of these fits, i.e. squared correlation coefficients (R2), are shown. The statistical significance was assessed using permutation tests (n = 999), and presented p-values are approximations.
Levels of Schistosoma-induced cytokine responses in 72 h whole blood cultures (n = 200).
| Antigen | Species | Cytokine | Response (%) | Median Concentration in pg/ml (IQR) |
| |
|
|
| |||||
| IL-10 | 92.0 | 12.7 | (5.2–32.4) | 0.874 | ||
| IL-5 | 78.5 | 3.7 | (1.0–19.0) |
| ||
| IFN-γ | 67.5 | 3.4 | (0.05–7.8) | 0.729 | ||
| TNF-α | 64.5 | 0.7 | (0.03–2.2) |
| ||
| IL-2 | 80.0 | 6.3 | (2.0–18.8) |
| ||
|
| ||||||
| IL-10 | 90.5 | 13.1 | (4.7–32.2) | |||
| IL-5 | 77.0 | 5.2 | (0.9–47.4) | |||
| IFN-γ | 63.0 | 4.2 | (0.05–7.8) | |||
| TNF-α | 67.5 | 1.0 | (0.03–4.3) | |||
| IL-2 | 80.5 | 8.2 | (2.1–54.7) | |||
|
|
| |||||
| IL-10 | 98.5 | 25.7 | (13.2–48.2) |
| ||
| IL-5 | 94.5 | 69.3 | (11.8–201.2) |
| ||
| IFN-γ | 74.5 | 5.4 | (0.05–9.4) |
| ||
| TNF-α | 90.5 | 4.6 | (1.2–10.9) |
| ||
| IL-2 | 98.0 | 60.3 | (22.4–152.1) |
| ||
|
| ||||||
| IL-10 | 99.0 | 30.0 | (17.0–50.4) | |||
| IL-5 | 96.0 | 108.6 | (25.9–237.9) | |||
| IFN-γ | 78.5 | 6.3 | (1.7–12.1) | |||
| TNF-α | 96.5 | 6.0 | (2.7–15.1) | |||
| IL-2 | 98.0 | 99.5 | (42.4–224.5) | |||
|
| ||||||
| IL-10 | 59.5 | 1.7 | (0.03–4.9) | |||
| IL-5 | 57.0 | 0.9 | (0.02–2.6) | |||
| IFN-γ | 58.0 | 2.2 | (0.05–5.8) | |||
| TNF-α | 63.5 | 0.4 | (0.03–1.5) | |||
| IL-2 | 45.5 | 0.03 | (0.03–2.9) | |||
Blood samples from one individual were divided into five and stimulated with Schistosoma antigens (SEAm, SEAh, AWAm, or AWAh), and with medium only (negative control; see Materials and Methods).
Crude cytokine levels are reported. IQR: Interquartile range (Tukey's hinges).
Wilcoxon Signed Rank test comparing S. mansoni- and S. haematobium-induced cytokine levels within individuals (either for SEA or AWA).
Schistosoma egg antigen.
Adult worm antigen.