Maryann Mason1, Hatidza Zaganjor2, Christine T Bozlak3, Colleen Lammel-Harmon4, Lucy Gomez-Feliciano2, Adam B Becker5. 1. Departments of Pediatrics and Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 225 E. Chicago Ave, Box 157, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail: Mmason@luriechildrens.org. Dr Mason is also affiliated with the Consortium to Lower Obesity in Chicago Children. 2. Logan Square Neighborhood Association, Chicago, Illinois. 3. University at Albany School of Public Health, Rensselaer, New York. 4. Chicago Park District, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Consortium to Lower Obesity in Chicago Children, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this case study was to evaluate the acceptability, sales impact, and implementation barriers for the Chicago Park District's 100% Healthier Snack Vending Initiative to strengthen and support future healthful vending efforts. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: The Chicago Park District is the largest municipal park system in the United States, serving almost 200,000 children annually through after-school and summer programs. Chicago is one of the first US cities to improve park food environments through more healthful snack vending. METHODS: A community-based participatory evaluation engaged community and academic partners, who shared in all aspects of the research. From spring 2011 to fall 2012, we collected data through observation, surveys, and interviews on staff and patron acceptance of snack vending items, purchasing behaviors, and machine operations at a sample of 10 Chicago parks. A new snack vending contract included nutrition standards for serving sizes, calories, sugar, fat, and sodium for all items. Fifteen months of snack vending sales data were collected from all 98 snack vending machines in park field houses. OUTCOMES: Staff (100%) and patrons (88%) reacted positively to the initiative. Average monthly per-machine sales increased during 15 months ($84 to $371). Vendor compliance issues included stocking noncompliant items and delayed restocking. INTERPRETATION: The initiative resulted in improved park food environments. Diverse partner engagement, participatory evaluation, and early attention to compliance can be important supports for healthful vending initiatives. Consumer acceptance and increasing revenues can help to counter fears of revenue loss that can pose barriers to adoption.
BACKGROUND: The objective of this case study was to evaluate the acceptability, sales impact, and implementation barriers for the Chicago Park District's 100% Healthier Snack Vending Initiative to strengthen and support future healthful vending efforts. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: The Chicago Park District is the largest municipal park system in the United States, serving almost 200,000 children annually through after-school and summer programs. Chicago is one of the first US cities to improve park food environments through more healthful snack vending. METHODS: A community-based participatory evaluation engaged community and academic partners, who shared in all aspects of the research. From spring 2011 to fall 2012, we collected data through observation, surveys, and interviews on staff and patron acceptance of snack vending items, purchasing behaviors, and machine operations at a sample of 10 Chicago parks. A new snack vending contract included nutrition standards for serving sizes, calories, sugar, fat, and sodium for all items. Fifteen months of snack vending sales data were collected from all 98 snack vending machines in park field houses. OUTCOMES: Staff (100%) and patrons (88%) reacted positively to the initiative. Average monthly per-machine sales increased during 15 months ($84 to $371). Vendor compliance issues included stocking noncompliant items and delayed restocking. INTERPRETATION: The initiative resulted in improved park food environments. Diverse partner engagement, participatory evaluation, and early attention to compliance can be important supports for healthful vending initiatives. Consumer acceptance and increasing revenues can help to counter fears of revenue loss that can pose barriers to adoption.
Authors: Stephen J Onufrak; Hatidza Zaganjor; Latetia V Moore; Heather C Hamner; Joel E Kimmons; Leah M Maynard; Diane Harris Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2019-01-02
Authors: Hatidza Zaganjor; Katherine Bishop Kendrick; Stephen Onufrak; Julie Ralston Aoki; Laurie P Whitsel; Joel Kimmons Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2019-08-01
Authors: Angie L Cradock; Erica L Kenney; Anne McHugh; Lisa Conley; Rebecca S Mozaffarian; Jennifer F Reiner; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Victoria Haldane; Fiona L H Chuah; Aastha Srivastava; Shweta R Singh; Gerald C H Koh; Chia Kee Seng; Helena Legido-Quigley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tanya M Horacek; Elif Dede Yildirim; Melissa Matthews Schreiber; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Sarah Colby; Adrienne A White; Karla P Shelnutt; Melissa D Olfert; Anne E Mathews; Kristin Riggsbee; Lisa Franzen-Castle; Jesse Stabile Morrell; Kendra Kattelmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cassandra Lane; Patti-Jean Naylor; Dona Tomlin; Sara Kirk; Rhona Hanning; Louise Masse; Dana Lee Olstad; Rachel Prowse; Susan Caswell; Sherry Jarvis; Todd Milford; Kim Raine Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2019-08-07