| Literature DB >> 25101135 |
He Zhang1, Ying Dong2, Bin Qi2, Li Liu2, Guangxin Zhou2, Xueyuan Bai2, Chunhui Yang3, Daqing Zhao2, Yu Zhao2.
Abstract
Deer sinew (DS) has been used traditionally for various illnesses, and the major active constituent is collagen. In this study, we assessed the effects of collagen peptide from DS on <span class="Disease">bone loss in the ovariectomized <span class="Species">rats. Wister female rats were randomly divided into six groups as follows: sham-operated (SHAM), ovariectomized control (OVX), OVX given 1.0 mg/kg/week nylestriol (OVX + N), OVX given 0.4 g/kg/day collagen peptide (OVX + H), OVX given 0.2 g/kg/day collagen peptide (OXV + M), and OVX given 0.1 g/kg/day collagen peptide (OXV + L), respectively. After 13 weeks of treatment, the rats were euthanized, and the effects of collagen peptide on body weight, uterine weight, bone mineral density (BMD), serum biochemical indicators, bone histomorphometry, and bone mechanics were observed. The data showed that BMD and concentration of serum hydroxyproline were significantly increased and the levels of serum calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase were decreased. Besides, histomorphometric parameters and mechanical indicators were improved. However, collagen peptide of DS has no effect on estradiol level, body weight, and uterine weight. Therefore, these results suggest that the collagen peptide supplementation may also prevent and treat bone loss.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25101135 PMCID: PMC4102020 DOI: 10.1155/2014/627285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1HPLC profiles of collagen peptide of deer sinew. Note: (a) collagen of deer sinew was extracted in boiling water. (b) Collagen peptide was treated with trypsin (1 : 1000, w/w) at 37°C for 3 h after boiling water.
Molecular size distributions with HPLC of collagen peptide.
| Number | Retention time (min) | Molecular weight (Da) | Peak area percentage (%) | Number | Retention time (min) | Molecular weight (Da) | Peak area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.37 | 367553 | 35.38 | 1′ | 12.31 | 377016 | 0.59 |
| 2 | 17.80 | 36829 | 29.13 | 2′ | 15.29 | 106669 | 1.09 |
| 3 | 19.07 | 21504 | 5.26 | 3′ | 23.05 | 3982 | 98.32 |
| 4 | 19.58 | 17325 | 24.99 | ||||
| 5 | 24.80 | 1897 | 4.38 | ||||
| 6 | 28.62 | 376 | 0.86 |
Amino acid composition of collagen peptide.
| Amino acid | Content (%) |
|---|---|
| Gly | 32.81 |
| Ala | 14.80 |
| Pro | 14.59 |
| Hyp | 6.99 |
| Arg | 6.94 |
| Lys | 5.47 |
| Glu | 3.18 |
| Leu | 2.97 |
| Phe | 2.47 |
| Asp | 2.40 |
| Ser | 2.14 |
| Val | 1.88 |
| Thr | 1.53 |
| Ile | 0.87 |
| Tyr | 0.37 |
| Met | 0.33 |
| His | 0.28 |
Figure 2BMD for all the groups after 13 weeks of treatment. Note: **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 compared with OVX group.
Figure 3The changes in body weight in each group during 13 weeks.
Figure 4Body and uterine weight in different treatment groups after 13 weeks. Note: **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 compared with OVX group.
Effects of collagen peptide on serum biochemical markers in ovariectomized rats (n = 10).
| Group | Target | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | P | ALP | E2
| Hyp | |
| Sham | 2.36 ± 0.13** | 1.56 ± 0.12** | 82.43 ± 12.47** | 26.99 ± 6.08*** | 28.86 ± 2.19* |
| OVX | 2.54 ± 0.11 | 1.78 ± 0.15 | 108.58 ± 16.96 | 10.27 ± 2.65 | 31.43 ± 1.78 |
| OVX + N | 2.43 ± 0.12* | 1.65 ± 0.11* | 93.64 ± 10.38* | 16.43 ± 3.62** | 29.75 ± 1.98 |
| OVX + H | 2.43 ± 0.11 | 1.65 ± 0.07* | 94.68 ± 11.35* | 10.06 ± 3.54 | 37.43 ± 2.96*** |
| OVX + M | 2.41 ± 0.14 | 1.70 ± 0.09 | 97.33 ± 10.68 | 10.31 ± 4.05 | 36.68 ± 3.29** |
| OVX + L | 2.45 ± 0.10 | 1.69 ± 0.15 | 94.22 ± 15.53 | 10.04 ± 4.06 | 34.38 ± 4.14 |
Note: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 compared with OVX group.
Effects of collagen peptide on bone mechanics indicators in ovariectomized rats (n = 10).
| Group | Target | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sham | 132.20 ± 26.49** | 0.79 ± 0.26* | 661.00 ± 132.47** | 123.90 ± 23.17* |
| OVX | 91.80 ± 17.99 | 0.54 ± 0.17 | 459.00 ± 89.93 | 95.70 ± 23.00 |
| OVX + N | 121.80 ± 8.99** | 0.73 ± 0.23 | 609.00 ± 44.96** | 137.68 ± 27.51* |
| OVX + H | 114.60 ± 16.08* | 0.71 ± 0.13* | 573.000 ± 80.42* | 120.28 ± 36.19 |
| OVX + M | 110.40 ± 21.63* | 0.63 ± 0.19 | 552.00 ± 108.17* | 108.60 ± 19.85 |
| OVX + L | 100.80 ± 22.33 | 0.58 ± 0.10 | 504.00 ± 111.67 | 109.63 ± 31.13 |
Note: *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 compared with OVX group.
Effects of collagen peptide on bone histomorphometric parameters in ovariectomized rats (n = 10).
| Group | Target | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tb.N | Tb.Th | Tb.Sp | TV/BV | Cb.Th | |
| SHAM | 3.60 ± 0.70*** | 8.25 ± 0.16** | 9.50 ± 1.03*** | 36.64 ± 3.27*** | 12.21 ± 0.14** |
| OVX | 0.90 ± 0.32 | 7.96 ± 0.20 | 16.44 ± 1.51 | 20.31 ± 4.17 | 11.95 ± 0.11 |
| OVX + N | 1.70 ± 0.67* | 8.12 ± 0.12 | 12.95 ± 1.92** | 25.36 ± 4.58* | 12.15 ± 0.21* |
| OVX + H | 1.70 ± 0.48** | 8.13 ± 0.13* | 12.68 ± 0.65*** | 27.28 ± 1.94** | 12.12 ± 0.19** |
| OVX + M | 1.60 ± 0.52* | 8.11 ± 0.17 | 13.09 ± 1.16*** | 26.58 ± 2.24** | 12.11 ± 0.24 |
| OVX + L | 1.60 ± 0.52** | 8.17 ± 0.17 | 13.27 ± 0.87*** | 26.36 ± 2.26** | 12.14 ± 0.24 |
Note: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 compared with OVX group.
Figure 5Photomicrographs of trabecular bone. Note: undecalcified section (100x magnification) shows trabecular bone using multifunction true color pathological image analyzer. (a) SHAM, (b) OVX, (c) OVX + N, (d) OVX + H, (e) OVX + M, and (f) OVX + L.