| Literature DB >> 25101133 |
Thiago Bruno Lima Prando1, Tatiane da Fonseca Baciquete1, Jennifer Alexandra Castanho Vieira1, Jaqueline Bressan1, Francielly Mourão Gasparotto2, Douglas Rossi Jesus1, Euclides Lara Cardozo Junior1, Emerson Luiz Botelho Lourenço1, Arquimedes Gasparotto Junior2.
Abstract
Several species of the genus Piper are known in Brazilian folk medicine as having diuretic activity. So, we propose to investigate the acute diuretic activity and the possible toxic effects of Piper glabratum Kunth, popularly known as false Jaborandi. Additionally, we propose to check whether there is any correlation between the biological activities of the crude extract (MEPG) and its 2-methoxy-4,5-methylenedioxy-trans-cinnamoyl-pyrrolidine (MMCP) in Wistar rats. The MEPG was fractioned by chromatography column and the MMCP was identified by analyses of (1)H and (13)C RMN spectral data and correlations. Both MEPG and MMCP were assayed for diuretic activity. The preparations obtained were orally administered in a single dose to rats. The urine excretion, pH, density, conductivity, and content of Na(+), K(+), Cl(-), and HCO3 (-) were measured in the urine of saline-loaded animals. Additionally, acute toxicity of the extract was also evaluated. MMCP at doses of 30 mg/kg was able to increase the urine volume, pH, and HCO3 (-) excretion. Moreover, high dosage of MEPG showed important liver toxicity and elevated mortality when injected intraperitoneally. The results indicate that the MMCP shows important diuretic properties when administered in Wistar rats. Additionally, MEPG can induce important acute toxicity if given in high doses.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25101133 PMCID: PMC4102017 DOI: 10.1155/2014/615109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3), 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3), 1H, 13C–HMQC, and 1H, 13C–HMBC data of P-1 compound.
|
|
Chemical shifts δ in ppm relative to TMS, J in Hz.
Effect of acute oral administration of methanolic extract from Piper glabratum (MEPG) and its pyrrolidine amide (MMCP) on urinary volume, electrolyte excretion, pH, and conductivity.
| Group | Urine | Na+
| K+
| Cl−
| HCO3
−
| pH | Conductivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 2.15 ± 0.3 | 106.0 ± 4.1 | 37.0 ± 6.4 | 145.0 ± 12.5 | 225.0 ± 19.5 | 6.0 ± 0.4 | 14.3 ± 0.5 |
| HCTZ (10 mg/kg) | 3.96 ± 0.5a | 140.3 ± 8.6a | 55.5 ± 4.3a | 160.0 ± 11.1 | 257.0 ± 18.1 | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 16.3 ± 0.7a |
| MEPG (30 mg/kg) | 2.52 ± 0.2 | 114.5 ± 6.1 | 45.7 ± 2.7 | 150.0 ± 26.4 | 230.0 ± 25.0 | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 15.0 ± 1.1 |
| MEPG (100 mg/kg) | 2.24 ± 0.4 | 99.7 ± 9.9 | 36.2 ± 9.7 | 130.0 ± 28.8 | 245.0 ± 27.5 | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 13.7 ± 2.2 |
| MEPG (300 mg/kg) | 2.28 ± 0.4 | 100.0 ± 8.7 | 36.5 ± 6.1 | 125.0 ± 10.5 | 250.0 ± 11.5 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 14.8 ± 1.6 |
| MMCP (3 mg/kg) | 2.51 ± 0.2 | 99.5 ± 6.2 | 34.0 ± 4.8 | 155.0 ± 12.5 | 280.0 ± 18.9 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 13.5 ± 1.2 |
| MMCP (10 mg/kg) | 2.60 ± 0.3 | 94.0 ± 9.0 | 48.6 ± 6.4 | 140.0 ± 23.0 | 315.0 ± 42.7 | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 15.0 ± 1.3 |
| MMCP (30 mg/kg) | 3.30 ± 0.33a | 120.7 ± 8.3 | 41.8 ± 6.6 | 125.0 ± 15.0 | 380.0 ± 11.5a | 8.4 ± 0.3a | 15.9 ± 0.9 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of six rats in each group in comparison to the control using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's test (a P < 0.05). HCTZ: hydrochlorothiazide; MMCP: 2-methoxy-4, 5-methylenedioxy-trans-cinnamoyl-pyrrolidine.
Acute toxicity variables after treatment with methanolic extract from Piper glabratum (MEPG) in male and female Wistar rats.
| Parameters | Experimental groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | MEPG (1 g/kg; i.p.) | MEPG (3 g/kg; i.p.) | MEPG (3 g/kg; p.o.) | |
| Body weights (g), males | 330.2 ± 3.7 | 322.7 ± 4.0 | 285.1 ± 2.7a | 316.1 ± 4.6 |
| Water intake (g), males | 233.6 ± 7.6 | 240.4 ± 9.2 | 175.7 ± 9.9a | 244.6 ± 8.4 |
| Food intake (g), males | 151.6 ± 5.6 | 122.7 ± 7.9 | 114.9 ± 6.7a | 145.1 ± 4.5 |
| Body weights (g), females | 274.0 ± 1.3 | 268.6 ± 2.4 | 243.2 ± 3.1a | 277.5 ± 1.3 |
| Water intake (g), females | 199.7 ± 11.3 | 142.3 ± 7.6 | 134.1 ± 6.5a | 202.0 ± 7.1 |
| Food intake (g), females | 122.1 ± 4.7 | 118.4 ± 8.7 | 91.5 ± 5.6a | 117.1 ± 3.8 |
| Relative liver weights | ||||
| Liver (%), males | 4.13 ± 0.19 | 4.33 ± 0.32 | 3.96 ± 0.07 | 3.91 ± 0.09 |
| Liver (%), females | 2.79 ± 0.24 | 3.13 ± 0.24 | 2.46 ± 0.04 | 2.72 ± 0.18 |
| Liver function tests | ||||
| AST (mg/dL), males | 111.4 ± 8.3 | 163.8 ± 11.9 | 289.5 ± 11.3a | 159.0 ± 29.9 |
| ALT (mg/dL), males | 63.0 ± 5.1 | 81.7 ± 3.3 | 216.8 ± 31.7a | 90.80 ± 9.7 |
| AST (mg/dL), females | 107.6 ± 8.1 | 100.0 ± 11.9 | 181.5 ± 14.0a | 101.2 ± 6.0 |
| ALT (mg/dL), females | 46.0 ± 4.0 | 40.2 ± 5.6 | 122.0 ± 21.6a | 51.4 ± 1.8 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM of six rats in each group in comparison to the control using one-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's test or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Mann-Whitney test (relative liver weights) (a P < 0.05). AST: aspartate transaminase; ALT: alanine transaminase; i.p.: intraperitoneally; p.o.: per oral route.