Literature DB >> 25100877

Response to the Letters from W. Kühn et al. and H. Griesser, K. Marquardt and B. Jordan on "Comments to the Publication of Munich Nomenclature III by the Cytology Coordination Conference" (Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2014; 74: 242-243).

P Hillemanns1, A Schneider1.   

Abstract

Year:  2014        PMID: 25100877      PMCID: PMC4119105          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1368643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Method comparison between Munich II and III nomenclature for Pap smear samples.

Authors:  Christoph Cirkel; Claudia Barop; Daniel A Beyer
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2015-11-02

2.  Progression or Regression? - Strengths and Weaknesses of the New Munich Nomenclature III for Cervix Cytology.

Authors:  Z Hilal; C Tempfer; S Schiermeier; J Reinecke; C Ruppenkamp; Z Hilal
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.915

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.