Isabella W Y Mak1, Nathan Evaniew1, Snezana Popovic1, Richard Tozer1, Michelle Ghert1. 1. Departments of Surgery (I.W.Y.M., N.E., and M.G.), Pathology and Molecular Science (S.P.), and Oncology (R.T.), McMaster University, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada. E-mail addresses for I.W.Y. Mak: isamak@gmail.com; maki2@mcmaster.ca. E-mail address for N. Evaniew: nathan.evaniew@medportal.ca. E-mail address for S. Popovic: popovics@hhsc.ca. E-mail address for R. Tozer: richard.tozer@jcc.hhsc.ca. E-mail address for M. Ghert: michelle.ghert@jcc.hhsc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor of bone is a primary bone tumor that is treated surgically and is associated with high morbidity in many cases. This tumor consists of giant cells expressing RANK (receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB) and mesenchymal spindle-like stromal cells expressing RANKL (RANK ligand); the interaction of these cells leads to bone resorption. Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds RANKL and directly inhibits osteoclastogenesis. Clinical studies have suggested clinical and histological improvement when denosumab was administered to patients with a giant cell tumor. However, no studies have yet examined the viability and functional characteristics of tumor cells following denosumab treatment. METHODS: Specimens were obtained from six patients with a histologically confirmed giant cell tumor. Two of the patients had been treated with denosumab for six months. Primary cultures of stromal cells from fresh tumor tissue were established. Cell proliferation was measured over a two-day time course. The expression of RANKL and osteoprotegerin was analyzed with use of real-time PCR (polymerase chain reaction). RESULTS: Histological specimens from both patients who had completed denosumab treatment showed the absence of giant cells but persistence of stromal cells. Cell proliferation studies indicated that proliferation of stromal cells cultured from clinical specimens following denosumab treatment was approximately 50% slower than that of specimens from untreated patients. The expression of RANKL in the specimens from the treated patients was almost completely eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Once the giant cell tumor tissue was no longer exposed to denosumab, the stromal cells continued to proliferate in vitro, albeit to a lesser degree. However, they also showed almost complete loss of RANKL expression. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is clear that treatment with denosumab only partially addresses the therapeutic need of patients with a giant cell tumor by wiping out the osteoclasts but leaving the neoplastic stromal cells proliferative.
BACKGROUND:Giant cell tumor of bone is a primary bone tumor that is treated surgically and is associated with high morbidity in many cases. This tumor consists of giant cells expressing RANK (receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB) and mesenchymal spindle-like stromal cells expressing RANKL (RANK ligand); the interaction of these cells leads to bone resorption. Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds RANKL and directly inhibits osteoclastogenesis. Clinical studies have suggested clinical and histological improvement when denosumab was administered to patients with a giant cell tumor. However, no studies have yet examined the viability and functional characteristics of tumor cells following denosumab treatment. METHODS: Specimens were obtained from six patients with a histologically confirmed giant cell tumor. Two of the patients had been treated with denosumab for six months. Primary cultures of stromal cells from fresh tumor tissue were established. Cell proliferation was measured over a two-day time course. The expression of RANKL and osteoprotegerin was analyzed with use of real-time PCR (polymerase chain reaction). RESULTS: Histological specimens from both patients who had completed denosumab treatment showed the absence of giant cells but persistence of stromal cells. Cell proliferation studies indicated that proliferation of stromal cells cultured from clinical specimens following denosumab treatment was approximately 50% slower than that of specimens from untreated patients. The expression of RANKL in the specimens from the treated patients was almost completely eliminated. CONCLUSIONS: Once the giant cell tumor tissue was no longer exposed to denosumab, the stromal cells continued to proliferate in vitro, albeit to a lesser degree. However, they also showed almost complete loss of RANKL expression. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is clear that treatment with denosumab only partially addresses the therapeutic need of patients with a giant cell tumor by wiping out the osteoclasts but leaving the neoplastic stromal cells proliferative.