Literature DB >> 25100700

Evolution of positive and negative density-dependent dispersal.

António M M Rodrigues1, Rufus A Johnstone2.   

Abstract

Understanding the evolution of density-dependent dispersal strategies has been a major challenge for evolutionary ecologists. Some existing models suggest that selection should favour positive and others negative density-dependence in dispersal. Here, we develop a general model that shows how and why selection may shift from positive to negative density-dependence in response to key ecological factors, in particular the temporal stability of the environment. We find that in temporally stable environments, particularly with low dispersal costs and large group sizes, habitat heterogeneity selects for negative density-dependent dispersal, whereas in temporally variable environments, particularly with high dispersal costs and small group sizes, habitat heterogeneity selects for positive density-dependent dispersal. This shift reflects the changing balance between the greater competition for breeding opportunities in more productive patches, versus the greater long-term value of offspring that establish themselves there, the latter being very sensitive to the temporal stability of the environment. In general, dispersal of individuals out of low-density patches is much more sensitive to habitat heterogeneity than is dispersal out of high-density patches.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  conditional dispersal; local competition; phenotypic plasticity; spatial and temporal heterogeneity; unconditional dispersal

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25100700      PMCID: PMC4132684          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Evolutionarily stable dispersal rate in a metapopulation with extinctions and kin competition

Authors: 
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Evolution of density- and patch-size-dependent dispersal rates.

Authors:  Hans Joachim Poethke; Thomas Hovestadt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Dispersal, kin competition, and the ideal free distribution in a spatially heterogeneous population.

Authors:  Henri Leturque; François Rousset
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Evolution of helping and harming in heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Asymmetric patch size distribution leads to disruptive selection on dispersal.

Authors:  François Massol; Anne Duputié; Patrice David; Philippe Jarne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Body condition dependent dispersal in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  Mats Gyllenberg; Éva Kisdi; Margarete Utz
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Evolution of helping and harming in viscous populations when group size varies.

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Condition and phenotype-dependent dispersal in a damselfly, Calopteryx splendens.

Authors:  Audrey Chaput-Bardy; Arnaud Grégoire; Michel Baguette; Alain Pagano; Jean Secondi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Competition between relatives and the evolution of dispersal in a parasitoid wasp.

Authors:  T M Innocent; J Abe; S A West; S E Reece
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Analysis of disruptive selection in subdivided populations.

Authors:  Emile Ajar
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  5 in total

1.  Spatial genetic structure in American black bears (Ursus americanus): female philopatry is variable and related to population history.

Authors:  Thea V Kristensen; Emily E Puckett; Erin L Landguth; Jerrold L Belant; John T Hast; Colin Carpenter; Jaime L Sajecki; Jeff Beringer; Myron Means; John J Cox; Lori S Eggert; Don White; Kimberly G Smith
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Simultaneous failure of two sex-allocation invariants: implications for sex-ratio variation within and between populations.

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The constant philopater hypothesis: a new life history invariant for dispersal evolution.

Authors:  A M M Rodrigues; A Gardner
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 4.  Genetics of dispersal.

Authors:  Marjo Saastamoinen; Greta Bocedi; Julien Cote; Delphine Legrand; Frédéric Guillaume; Christopher W Wheat; Emanuel A Fronhofer; Cristina Garcia; Roslyn Henry; Arild Husby; Michel Baguette; Dries Bonte; Aurélie Coulon; Hanna Kokko; Erik Matthysen; Kristjan Niitepõld; Etsuko Nonaka; Virginie M Stevens; Justin M J Travis; Kathleen Donohue; James M Bullock; Maria Del Mar Delgado
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2017-08-03

5.  Sex, personality and conspecific density influence natal dispersal with lifetime fitness consequences in urban and rural burrowing owls.

Authors:  Álvaro Luna; Antonio Palma; Ana Sanz-Aguilar; José L Tella; Martina Carrete
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.