Literature DB >> 25100504

Cardiovascular MRI predicts 5-year adverse clinical outcome in heart transplant recipients.

C R Butler1, D H Kim, K Chow, M Toma, R Thompson, M Mengel, M Haykowsky, G J Pearson, I Paterson.   

Abstract

Imaging recommendations for the follow-up of heart transplant recipients (HTRs) lack evidence justifying their prognostic value. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) can characterize heart structure and function and has prognostic value in many myocardial diseases. We hypothesized that CMRI evaluation of cardiac allografts would predict adverse events. We performed CMRI on 60 HTRs evaluating biventricular size, function and myocardial scar. We performed survival analysis to identify independent predictors of cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalization. Participants had a mean age of 51 ± 14 years, mean graft age of 3.5 years (±4) and 75% are male. Median follow-up time was 4.9 years with 22 CV hospitalizations and 7 CV deaths. A multivariable survival analysis of imaging and clinical variables identified myocardial scar (hazard ratio [HR] of 10.7, p = 0.005), right ventricular end- diastolic volume index (RVEDVI; 1.1/mL/m(2) , p = 0.001), graft age (HR = 1.2/year, p = 0.004) and previous allograft rejection (HR = 4.4, p = 0.006) as predictive of time to CV death or hospitalization. CMRI-derived myocardial scar and RVEDVI are independently associated with CV outcomes in HTRs. © Copyright 2014 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research/practice; diagnostic techniques and imaging: magnetic resonance imaging; heart (allograft) function/dysfunction; heart transplantation/cardiology; patient survival

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25100504     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  10 in total

1.  Myocardial Fibrosis and Prognosis in Heart Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Andrew Hughes; Osama Okasha; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Felipe Kazmirczak; Prabhjot S Nijjar; Pratik Velangi; Mehmet Akçakaya; Cindy M Martin; Chetan Shenoy
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Cardiac magnetic resonance for the risk stratification of heart transplant recipients: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Nina P Hofmann; Hugo A Katus; Grigorios Korosoglou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Imaging in patients with advanced therapies for heart failure.

Authors:  Joanna M Joly; Steven G Lloyd
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Natural History of Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement Predicts Adverse Clinical Events in Heart Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Kongkiat Chaikriangkrai; Muhannad Aboud Abbasi; Roberto Sarnari; Daniel Lee; Allen S Anderson; Kambiz Ghafourian; Sadiya S Khan; Esther E Vorovich; Jonathan D Rich; Jane E Wilcox; Julie A Blaisdell; Clyde W Yancy; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-17

Review 5.  Multi-modal imaging of the pediatric heart transplant recipient.

Authors:  Jonathan H Soslow; Margaret M Samyn
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10

6.  Diagnostic performance of late gadolinium enhancement in the assessment of acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Evrim Şimşek; Sanem Nalbantgil; Naim Ceylan; Mehdi Zoghi; Hatice Soner Kemal; Çağatay Engin; Tahir Yağdı; Mustafa Özbaran
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance with regadenoson stress perfusion is safe following pediatric heart transplantation and identifies history of rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.

Authors:  Nazia Husain; Kae Watanabe; Haben Berhane; Aditi Gupta; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Insight into Noninvasive Radiological Modalities to Detect Heart Transplant Rejection.

Authors:  Dhruva Sharma; Ganapathy Subramaniam; Neha Sharma; Preksha Sharma; Pooja Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-11

9.  Prognostic Value of Myocardial Extracellular Volume Fraction and T2-mapping in Heart Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Kongkiat Chaikriangkrai; Muhannad Aboud Abbasi; Roberto Sarnari; Ryan Dolan; Daniel Lee; Allen S Anderson; Kambiz Ghafourian; Sadiya S Khan; Esther E Vorovich; Jonathan D Rich; Jane E Wilcox; Julie A Blaisdell; Clyde W Yancy; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-03-18

Review 10.  Transplantation of Hearts Donated after Circulatory Death.

Authors:  Christopher W White; Simon J Messer; Stephen R Large; Jennifer Conway; Daniel H Kim; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Jayan Nagendran; Darren H Freed
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.