Literature DB >> 25100406

Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations.

G Moncada, P Vildósola, E Fernández, J Estay, O B de Oliveira Júnior, M F de Andrade, J Martin, I A Mjör, V V Gordan.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective, blind, and randomized clinical trial was to assess the effectiveness of repair of localized clinical defects in amalgam restorations that were initially scheduled for replacement. A cohort of 20 patients with 40 (Class I and Class II) amalgam restorations that presented one or more clinical features that deviated from the ideal (Bravo or Charlie) according to US Public Health Service criteria, were randomly assigned to either the repair or the replacement group-A: repair, n = 19; and B: replacement, n = 21. Two examiners who had calibration expertise evaluated the restorations at baseline and 10 years after according to seven parameters: marginal occlusal adaptation, anatomic form, surface roughness, marginal staining, contact, secondary caries, and luster. After 10 years, 30 restorations (75%) were evaluated (Group A: n = 17; Group B: n = 13). Repaired and replaced amalgam restorations showed similar survival outcomes regarding marginal defects and secondary caries in patients with low and medium caries risk, and most of the restorations were considered clinically acceptable after 10 years. Repair treatment increased the potential for tooth longevity, using a minimally interventional procedure. All restorations trend to downgrade over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25100406     DOI: 10.2341/14-045-C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  5 in total

1.  Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; David R Louis; Mark S Litaker; Helena M Minyé; Rahma Mungia; Valeria V Gordan; Don G Marshall; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  How to Bridge Research Results to Everyday Clinical Care?

Authors:  V V Gordan
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

3.  Risk of failure of repaired versus replaced defective direct restorations in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Teixeira Mendes; Djessica Pedrotti; Luciano Casagrande; Tathiane Larissa Lenzi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey L Fellows; Deborah A Dilbone; Solomon G Brotman; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Comparison of two clinical approaches based on visual criteria for secondary caries assessments and treatment decisions in permanent posterior teeth.

Authors:  Cacia Signori; Juliana Lays Stolfo Uehara; Vitor Henrique Digmayer Romero; Bruna Lorena Pereira Moro; Mariana Minatel Braga; Fausto Medeiros Mendes; Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.