Literature DB >> 25100315

The digital traces of bubbles: feedback cycles between socio-economic signals in the Bitcoin economy.

David Garcia1, Claudio J Tessone2, Pavlin Mavrodiev2, Nicolas Perony2.   

Abstract

What is the role of social interactions in the creation of price bubbles? Answering this question requires obtaining collective behavioural traces generated by the activity of a large number of actors. Digital currencies offer a unique possibility to measure socio-economic signals from such digital traces. Here, we focus on Bitcoin, the most popular cryptocurrency. Bitcoin has experienced periods of rapid increase in exchange rates (price) followed by sharp decline; we hypothesize that these fluctuations are largely driven by the interplay between different social phenomena. We thus quantify four socio-economic signals about Bitcoin from large datasets: price on online exchanges, volume of word-of-mouth communication in online social media, volume of information search and user base growth. By using vector autoregression, we identify two positive feedback loops that lead to price bubbles in the absence of exogenous stimuli: one driven by word of mouth, and the other by new Bitcoin adopters. We also observe that spikes in information search, presumably linked to external events, precede drastic price declines. Understanding the interplay between the socio-economic signals we measured can lead to applications beyond cryptocurrencies to other phenomena that leave digital footprints, such as online social network usage.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Bitcoin; bubbles; social interactions; socio-economic signals

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25100315      PMCID: PMC4233744          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  10 in total

1.  Complex dynamics of our economic life on different scales: insights from search engine query data.

Authors:  Tobias Preis; Daniel Reith; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Felix Reed-Tsochas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect.

Authors:  Jan Lorenz; Heiko Rauhut; Frank Schweitzer; Dirk Helbing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Social science. Computational social science.

Authors:  David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-Laszlo Barabasi; Devon Brewer; Nicholas Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James Fowler; Myron Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael Macy; Deb Roy; Marshall Van Alstyne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Web search queries can predict stock market volumes.

Authors:  Ilaria Bordino; Stefano Battiston; Guido Caldarelli; Matthieu Cristelli; Antti Ukkonen; Ingmar Weber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Tracking traders' understanding of the market using e-communication data.

Authors:  Serguei Saavedra; Jordi Duch; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What are the main drivers of the Bitcoin price? Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis.

Authors:  Ladislav Kristoufek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do the rich get richer? An empirical analysis of the Bitcoin transaction network.

Authors:  Dániel Kondor; Márton Pósfai; István Csabai; Gábor Vattay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  BitCoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era.

Authors:  Ladislav Kristoufek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends.

Authors:  Tobias Preis; Helen Susannah Moat; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total
  22 in total

1.  What are the main drivers of the Bitcoin price? Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis.

Authors:  Ladislav Kristoufek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Social signals and algorithmic trading of Bitcoin.

Authors:  David Garcia; Frank Schweitzer
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Statistical Analysis of the Exchange Rate of Bitcoin.

Authors:  Jeffrey Chu; Saralees Nadarajah; Stephen Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Computational models of consumer confidence from large-scale online attention data: crowd-sourcing econometrics.

Authors:  Xianlei Dong; Johan Bollen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predicting Fluctuations in Cryptocurrency Transactions Based on User Comments and Replies.

Authors:  Young Bin Kim; Jun Gi Kim; Wook Kim; Jae Ho Im; Tae Hyeong Kim; Shin Jin Kang; Chang Hun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modeling and Simulation of the Economics of Mining in the Bitcoin Market.

Authors:  Luisanna Cocco; Michele Marchesi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Buzz Factor or Innovation Potential: What Explains Cryptocurrencies' Returns?

Authors:  Sha Wang; Jean-Philippe Vergne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evolutionary dynamics of the cryptocurrency market.

Authors:  Abeer ElBahrawy; Laura Alessandretti; Anne Kandler; Romualdo Pastor-Satorras; Andrea Baronchelli
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  Cryptocurrency price drivers: Wavelet coherence analysis revisited.

Authors:  Ross C Phillips; Denise Gorse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Collective attention and stock prices: evidence from Google Trends data on Standard and Poor's 100.

Authors:  Raphael H Heiberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.