| Literature DB >> 25099835 |
Nicole Lafontaine1, Simon A Joosten2, Daniel Steinfort1, Louis Irving1, Mark Hew3.
Abstract
We examined the effects of a programme to improve adherence to British Thoracic Society pleural procedure guidelines at our institution. Following a baseline audit, we performed an intervention to enhance adherence to these guidelines. We then performed a postintervention audit. At baseline, there were different levels of guideline adherence depending on the specialty of the clinician inserting chest tubes. Interventions to improve adherence were hampered by limited access to non-respiratory teams. Thus, improvements in response to intervention were also specialty specific. Overall, procedures performed by respiratory medicine had higher adherence rates compared with those performed by non-respiratory teams. We concluded that guidelines promoted at a local level by one specialty have limited traction on members of another specialty. For pleural procedures, which cross specialty boundaries, we propose that future guidelines be developed jointly by all relevant specialties. This could facilitate unified guideline implementation at the clinical coalface.Entities:
Keywords: Pleural disease; chest tube insertion; pleural intervention
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25099835 PMCID: PMC4952827 DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-4-361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med (Lond) ISSN: 1470-2118 Impact factor: 2.659