Literature DB >> 25099325

Indirect foraminal decompression is independent of metabolically active facet arthropathy in extreme lateral interbody fusion.

Gregory M Malham1, Rhiannon M Parker, Ben Goss, Carl M Blecher, Zita E Ballok.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected, nonrandomized radiographical data.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between the presence of preoperative metabolically active facet arthropathy (FA) and the amount of indirect foraminal decompression gained after extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although evidence of significant radiographical indirect decompression after XLIF has been shown, the relationship between the extent of indirect decompression and the presence of potentially attenuating, FA is yet to be studied.
METHODS: A prospective database of consecutive patients undergoing XLIF was retrospectively analyzed. Posterior disc height, foraminal height, and cross-sectional foraminal area were measured on computed tomographic scans obtained preoperatively and 2 days postoperatively. The selected radiographical parameters were examined with respect to the presence of FA based on preoperative computed tomographic and bone scans.
RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive patients underwent 79 levels of XLIF without direct decompression. Average age was 66.4 years and 34 (65.4%) were females. Surgery resulted in significant increases in posterior disc height 3.0 to 5.7 mm (89.0% increase), P<0.0001; foraminal height 1.4 to 1.7 cm (38.0% increase), P<0.0001; and foraminal area 1.1 to 1.4 cm (45.1% increase), P<0.0001. These increases were independent of the presence of metabolically active arthropathy.
CONCLUSION: Significant indirect neural decompression is possible in XLIF, regardless of the presence of metabolically active FA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25099325     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  21 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical results and limitations of indirect decompression in spinal stenosis with laterally implanted interbody cages: results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Rhiannon M Parker; Ben Goss; Carl M Blecher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gun Keorochana; Kitipong Setrkraising; Patarawan Woratanarat; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Expandable Lateral Lumbar Cages With Integrated Fixation: A Viable Option for Rostral Adjacent Segment Disease.

Authors:  Gregory M Malham; Carl M Blecher; Nigel R Munday; Ryan P Hamer
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 5.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

6.  Novel Titanium Cages for Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: First Assessment of Subsidence.

Authors:  Paul R Krafft; Brooks Osburn; Andrew C Vivas; Gautam Rao; Puya Alikhani
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2019-12-20

7.  Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-09-22

8.  Indirect Decompression Failure After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Reported Failures and Predictive Factors: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sertac Kirnaz; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Jiaao Gu; Christoph Wipplinger; Ibrahim Hussain; Joshua Adjei; Eliana Kim; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Taylor Wong; Robert Nick Hernandez; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

9.  Resting Pain Level as a Preoperative Predictor of Success With Indirect Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Amrit S Khalsa; Areian Eghbali; Robert K Eastlack; Stacie Tran; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Justin B Ledesma; Gregory M Mundis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-07-26

10.  Dynamic Posture-Related Preoperative Pain as a Single Clinical Criterion in Patient Selection for Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Without Direct Decompression.

Authors:  Kai-Zheong Lim; Christopher Daly; Jessica Brown; Tony Goldschlager
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.